[Lxc-users] Fwd: RE: Price Request For lxc.org

[Brian K. White]

On 10/11/2011 6:37 PM, Brian K. White wrote:
> IEEE "does not honor requests" for applicant requested id's, but even
> for the locally administered,
>
> lxc 6c:78:63
> and
> LXC 4c:58:43
>
> are both out. l (6c) and L (4c) both have a second nibble c which has a
> second-least-significant bit 0
>
> 1100
> --^-
>
> Too bad, it's nice and high to avoid the bridge low mac address interaction.
>
>
> Backwards, cxl and CXL are both ok.
> 43:58:4c
> 63:78:6c
> -^:--:--
>
> 3
> 0011
> --^-
>
> cxl, containers by linux ?
>
>

lxc -> rot13 = ykp = 79:6b:70
9
1001
--^- = OK

ykp? what's that?
it's rot13 of lxc.
Why did they go through all that rigormorole?
"you know programmers"

hehe

LXC rot13 = YKP = 59:4b:50 = ok too

-- 
bkw