[lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

[Michael H. Warfield]

On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:36 -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On 12/10/2012 12:30 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:09 -0500, Dwight Engen wrote:
> >> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:17 -0500
> >> Stéphane Graber <stgraber at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 12/05/2012 11:54 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wanted to make all of
> >>>> you aware that we are currently planning on sending a pull request
> >>>> of the staging branch on the 10th of December (next Monday).
> >>>>
> >>>> This pull request will very likely contain everything that's
> >>>> currently in the staging branch and is intended to become
> >>>> 0.9.alpha1.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd therefore recommend everyone tests the current staging branch
> >>>> and sends any remaining bugfixes to the mailing list as soon as
> >>>> possible.
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, if a change you sent to the mailing-list hasn't been applied
> >>>> yet, it's very likely because I missed it as according to my mail
> >>>> client, there's no outstanding patch to review. In such case,
> >>>> please reply to this e-mail with a reference to your change and
> >>>> I'll make sure it's reviewed before I send the pull request.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> As far as I'm concerned, the staging branch is now ready for the
> >>> release of 0.9.alpha1.
> >>>
> >>> I plan on sending the merge proposal later this afternoon
> >>> (in 5-6 hours) after I've run some more tests on it.
> >>>
> >>> Test packages for Ubuntu can be found at:
> >>> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-lxc/+archive/daily/+packages
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> If you're aware of any critical bug currently affecting staging,
> >>> please speak up now :)
> > 
> >> Its not critical, but I think the above patch that replaces @LXCPATH@
> >> with %{_localstatedir}/* in the spec file should go in to fix building
> >> on Fedora. It'd be nice to hear an ack from Michael though :)
> > 
> > Aaaahhhh!  I meant to test that patch and got distracted.  Just tested.
> > Everything worked and the builds went fine on F17.  I'm good with it.
> > The current staging plus that change builds Fedora rpms just fine.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Michael H. Warfield <mhw at WittsEnd.com>
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Mike

> Took a bit of digging to find what patch you were referring to but I
> think I picked up the right one and pushed to staging :)

Tested.  And we are good.  Only thing in there is adjusting for the
version number (it currently claims 0.8.0) but that's normal for any
build spec in my experience.

> Thanks

Regards,
Mike
-- 
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 |  mhw at WittsEnd.com
   /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/          | (678) 463-0932 |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
   NIC whois: MHW9          | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0x674627FF        | possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 482 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-devel/attachments/20121210/7d478247/attachment.pgp>