[lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

[Stéphane Graber]

On 12/10/2012 12:30 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:09 -0500, Dwight Engen wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:17 -0500
>> Stéphane Graber <stgraber at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/05/2012 11:54 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wanted to make all of
>>>> you aware that we are currently planning on sending a pull request
>>>> of the staging branch on the 10th of December (next Monday).
>>>>
>>>> This pull request will very likely contain everything that's
>>>> currently in the staging branch and is intended to become
>>>> 0.9.alpha1.
>>>>
>>>> I'd therefore recommend everyone tests the current staging branch
>>>> and sends any remaining bugfixes to the mailing list as soon as
>>>> possible.
>>>>
>>>> Also, if a change you sent to the mailing-list hasn't been applied
>>>> yet, it's very likely because I missed it as according to my mail
>>>> client, there's no outstanding patch to review. In such case,
>>>> please reply to this e-mail with a reference to your change and
>>>> I'll make sure it's reviewed before I send the pull request.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> As far as I'm concerned, the staging branch is now ready for the
>>> release of 0.9.alpha1.
>>>
>>> I plan on sending the merge proposal later this afternoon
>>> (in 5-6 hours) after I've run some more tests on it.
>>>
>>> Test packages for Ubuntu can be found at:
>>> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-lxc/+archive/daily/+packages
>>>
>>>
>>> If you're aware of any critical bug currently affecting staging,
>>> please speak up now :)
> 
>> Its not critical, but I think the above patch that replaces @LXCPATH@
>> with %{_localstatedir}/* in the spec file should go in to fix building
>> on Fedora. It'd be nice to hear an ack from Michael though :)
> 
> Aaaahhhh!  I meant to test that patch and got distracted.  Just tested.
> Everything worked and the builds went fine on F17.  I'm good with it.
> The current staging plus that change builds Fedora rpms just fine.
> 
> Acked-by: Michael H. Warfield <mhw at WittsEnd.com>
> 
> Regards,
> Mike

Took a bit of digging to find what patch you were referring to but I
think I picked up the right one and pushed to staging :)

Thanks

-- 
Stéphane Graber
Ubuntu developer
http://www.ubuntu.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 899 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-devel/attachments/20121210/a0506998/attachment.pgp>