[lxc-devel] LXC 0.9.alpha1

Stéphane Graber stgraber at ubuntu.com
Mon Dec 10 18:28:51 UTC 2012


On 12/10/2012 12:59 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:36 -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>> On 12/10/2012 12:30 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:09 -0500, Dwight Engen wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:17 -0500
>>>> Stéphane Graber <stgraber at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/05/2012 11:54 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wanted to make all of
>>>>>> you aware that we are currently planning on sending a pull request
>>>>>> of the staging branch on the 10th of December (next Monday).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This pull request will very likely contain everything that's
>>>>>> currently in the staging branch and is intended to become
>>>>>> 0.9.alpha1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd therefore recommend everyone tests the current staging branch
>>>>>> and sends any remaining bugfixes to the mailing list as soon as
>>>>>> possible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, if a change you sent to the mailing-list hasn't been applied
>>>>>> yet, it's very likely because I missed it as according to my mail
>>>>>> client, there's no outstanding patch to review. In such case,
>>>>>> please reply to this e-mail with a reference to your change and
>>>>>> I'll make sure it's reviewed before I send the pull request.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> As far as I'm concerned, the staging branch is now ready for the
>>>>> release of 0.9.alpha1.
>>>>>
>>>>> I plan on sending the merge proposal later this afternoon
>>>>> (in 5-6 hours) after I've run some more tests on it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Test packages for Ubuntu can be found at:
>>>>> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-lxc/+archive/daily/+packages
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you're aware of any critical bug currently affecting staging,
>>>>> please speak up now :)
>>>
>>>> Its not critical, but I think the above patch that replaces @LXCPATH@
>>>> with %{_localstatedir}/* in the spec file should go in to fix building
>>>> on Fedora. It'd be nice to hear an ack from Michael though :)
>>>
>>> Aaaahhhh!  I meant to test that patch and got distracted.  Just tested.
>>> Everything worked and the builds went fine on F17.  I'm good with it.
>>> The current staging plus that change builds Fedora rpms just fine.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Michael H. Warfield <mhw at WittsEnd.com>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mike
> 
>> Took a bit of digging to find what patch you were referring to but I
>> think I picked up the right one and pushed to staging :)
> 
> Tested.  And we are good.  Only thing in there is adjusting for the
> version number (it currently claims 0.8.0) but that's normal for any
> build spec in my experience.
> 
>> Thanks
> 
> Regards,
> Mike

Good.

The plan is to send the pull-request without the commit changing the
version number and let Daniel pull and add that commit.


-- 
Stéphane Graber
Ubuntu developer
http://www.ubuntu.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 899 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-devel/attachments/20121210/408a7d91/attachment.pgp>


More information about the lxc-devel mailing list