[lxc-users] LXC, unionfs and short lived containers

[Fajar A. Nugraha]

On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks <
fransmeulenbroeks at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm working on migrating from LXC 1.x to LXC 2.
> While doing so I bumped upon the following issue:
>
> My containers are short-lived (say an hour or so).
> In LXC 1 we used an overlay filesystem in order to speed up the lxc create.
> However I understood LXC 2 does not have this capability.
>


Where did you read that?


> Any idea how to create containers quickly and efficiently in LXC 2
>
> Complication is that at some times we have a fair amount of containers
> alive (say around 50), so creating all containers and reverting to a
> snapshot is probably not efficient
>

Why is it not efficient?


> (apart from the space taken up by the 50 rootfs-es).
>
> Thanks in advance for any suggestions how to tacke this!
>


I'm pretty sure you can still use overlayfs with lxc-2.

My suggestion though, is go with lxd and zfs instead. You can have a
"golden" container, keep it stopped, and simply create your other
containers with "lxc copy". With zfs, the "copy" process will be instaneus,
and the "clone" will be its own filesystem (no lower/base directory
restriction like in aufs/overlayfs).

If you need to modify the "golden" container (which will affect all NEW
containers copied from it), simply start it and perform-your-changes like
on a normal container (don't forget to stop it afterwards). Note that this
is different from aufs/overlayfs, where generally you shouldn't touch the
lower/base directory.

-- 
Fajar
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20170129/cda5199d/attachment.html>