[lxc-users] lxd in Debian
Pierre Couderc
pierre at couderc.eu
Tue Aug 23 22:03:15 UTC 2016
Mmm, n'est-ce pas le marteau pour écraser la mouche..?
On 08/23/2016 10:45 PM, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 08:40:33PM +0000, P. Lowe wrote:
>> For socket activation of the LXD daemon or socket activation of a container?
> For socket activation of the LXD daemon,
>
> https://github.com/lxc/lxd/blob/master/lxd/daemon.go#L866
>
> Tycho
>
>> -P. Lowe
>>
>> Quoting Tycho Andersen <tycho.andersen at canonical.com>:
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:56:43PM +0000, P. Lowe wrote:
>>>> Why on earth does lxd depend on "golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-dev"?
>>>>
>>>> I'm also wondering, why should lxd even depend on systemd?
>>> LXD has the capability to be socket activated, this library implements
>>> a go API for handling the case when it is socket activated.
>>>
>>> Tycho
>>>
>>>> -P. Lowe
>>>>
>>>> Quoting "Fajar A. Nugraha" <list at fajar.net>:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Micky Del Favero <micky at mesina.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Paul Dino Jones <spacefreak18 at brak.space> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, i see lxc 2.0 has made it's way into Stretch and Jessie backports,
>>>>>>> but I don't see any activity on lxd. Is this going to happen in time
>>>>>>> for the Stretch freeze?
>>>>>> I've packaged LXD for Jessie (Devuan's, but the same applied to Debian),
>>>>>> here I've explain what I've do:
>>>>>> http://micky.it/log/compiling-lxd-on-devuan.html
>>>>>> https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/2016-July/012045.html
>>>>>> if nobody will package LXD you can do it yourself follow my way.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm confused.
>>>>>
>>>>> How did you managed to get it build, when the source from
>>>>> http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial-updates/lxd has
>>>>>
>>>>> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9),
>>>>> dh-apparmor,
>>>>> dh-golang,
>>>>> dh-systemd,
>>>>> golang-go,
>>>>> golang-go.crypto-dev,
>>>>> golang-context-dev,
>>>>> golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-dev,
>>>>> golang-github-gorilla-mux-dev,
>>>>> golang-github-gosexy-gettext-dev,
>>>>> golang-github-mattn-go-colorable-dev,
>>>>> golang-github-mattn-go-sqlite3-dev,
>>>>> golang-github-olekukonko-tablewriter-dev,
>>>>> golang-github-pborman-uuid-dev,
>>>>> golang-gocapability-dev,
>>>>> golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3-dev,
>>>>> golang-gopkg-inconshreveable-log15.v2-dev,
>>>>> golang-gopkg-lxc-go-lxc.v2-dev,
>>>>> golang-gopkg-tomb.v2-dev,
>>>>> golang-goprotobuf-dev,
>>>>> golang-petname-dev,
>>>>> golang-yaml.v2-dev,
>>>>> golang-websocket-dev,
>>>>> help2man,
>>>>> lxc-dev (>= 1.1.0~),
>>>>> pkg-config,
>>>>> protobuf-compiler
>>>>>
>>>>> and https://packages.debian.org/petname returns zero result?
>>>>> altlinux's lxd rpm (which I use as starting point for my c6 build) has
>>>>> similar requirement, and when I tried removing golang-petname-dev
>>>>> requirement when building for centos, the build failed, so I had to
>>>>> create a new rpm package for that.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Fajar
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> lxc-users mailing list
>>>>> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
>>>>> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> lxc-users mailing list
>>>> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
>>>> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lxc-users mailing list
>>> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
>>> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lxc-users mailing list
>> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
>> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
More information about the lxc-users
mailing list