[lxc-users] lxd in Debian

[Tycho Andersen]

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 08:40:33PM +0000, P. Lowe wrote:
> For socket activation of the LXD daemon or socket activation of a container?

For socket activation of the LXD daemon,

https://github.com/lxc/lxd/blob/master/lxd/daemon.go#L866

Tycho

> -P. Lowe
> 
> Quoting Tycho Andersen <tycho.andersen at canonical.com>:
> 
> >On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 04:56:43PM +0000, P. Lowe wrote:
> >>
> >>Why on earth does lxd depend on "golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-dev"?
> >>
> >>I'm also wondering, why should lxd even depend on systemd?
> >
> >LXD has the capability to be socket activated, this library implements
> >a go API for handling the case when it is socket activated.
> >
> >Tycho
> >
> >>-P. Lowe
> >>
> >>Quoting "Fajar A. Nugraha" <list at fajar.net>:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Micky Del Favero <micky at mesina.net> wrote:
> >>>>Paul Dino Jones <spacefreak18 at brak.space> writes:
> >>>>
> >>>>>So, i see lxc 2.0 has made it's way into Stretch and Jessie backports,
> >>>>>but I don't see any activity on lxd. Is this going to happen in time
> >>>>>for the Stretch freeze?
> >>>>
> >>>>I've packaged LXD for Jessie (Devuan's, but the same applied to Debian),
> >>>>here I've explain what I've do:
> >>>>http://micky.it/log/compiling-lxd-on-devuan.html
> >>>>https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/2016-July/012045.html
> >>>>if nobody will package LXD you can do it yourself follow my way.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I'm confused.
> >>>
> >>>How did you managed to get it build, when the source from
> >>>http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial-updates/lxd has
> >>>
> >>>Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9),
> >>>               dh-apparmor,
> >>>               dh-golang,
> >>>               dh-systemd,
> >>>               golang-go,
> >>>               golang-go.crypto-dev,
> >>>               golang-context-dev,
> >>>               golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-dev,
> >>>               golang-github-gorilla-mux-dev,
> >>>               golang-github-gosexy-gettext-dev,
> >>>               golang-github-mattn-go-colorable-dev,
> >>>               golang-github-mattn-go-sqlite3-dev,
> >>>               golang-github-olekukonko-tablewriter-dev,
> >>>               golang-github-pborman-uuid-dev,
> >>>               golang-gocapability-dev,
> >>>               golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3-dev,
> >>>               golang-gopkg-inconshreveable-log15.v2-dev,
> >>>               golang-gopkg-lxc-go-lxc.v2-dev,
> >>>               golang-gopkg-tomb.v2-dev,
> >>>               golang-goprotobuf-dev,
> >>>               golang-petname-dev,
> >>>               golang-yaml.v2-dev,
> >>>               golang-websocket-dev,
> >>>               help2man,
> >>>               lxc-dev (>= 1.1.0~),
> >>>               pkg-config,
> >>>               protobuf-compiler
> >>>
> >>>and https://packages.debian.org/petname returns zero result?
> >>>altlinux's lxd rpm (which I use as starting point for my c6 build) has
> >>>similar requirement, and when I tried removing golang-petname-dev
> >>>requirement when building for centos, the build failed, so I had to
> >>>create a new rpm package for that.
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Fajar
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>lxc-users mailing list
> >>>lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> >>>http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>lxc-users mailing list
> >>lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> >>http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> >_______________________________________________
> >lxc-users mailing list
> >lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> >http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users