[lxc-users] Compile fails under Fedora

[CDR]

This technology is being used on critical line-of-business
applications, at least in my company.
I wish that Stepahane or other would follow a more predictable
patch-releasing schedule.


On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Michael H. Warfield <mhw at wittsend.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 03:23 -0400, CDR wrote:
>> I did a "git pull" and ´when I issued a "make rpm", it failed
>>
>> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>>    /usr/lib/systemd/system/lxc-net.service
>> RPM build errors:
>>     File listed twice:
>> /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/_lxc-0.1-py3.3.egg-info
>>     File listed twice: /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/_lxc.cpython-33m.so
>>     File listed twice: /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/lxc/__init__.py
>>     File listed twice: /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/lxc/__pycache__
>>     File listed twice:
>> /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/lxc/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-33.pyc
>>     File listed twice:
>> /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/lxc/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-33.pyo
>>     File listed twice: /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-autostart-helper
>>     File listed twice: /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-devsetup
>>     File listed twice: /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-user-nic
>>     Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>>    /usr/lib/systemd/system/lxc-net.service
>> make: *** [rpm] Error 1
>>
>> Any idea how can I compile the software?
>
> You raised this issue on 08/09 for 1.1.0alpha1 under Fedora 20.  At that
> time yours was the second report and I was already looking into it.  You
> then raised the issue again on the -devel list on 09/05 for 1.1.0alpha1
> under CentOS 7 - exact same issue.  At that time the patches had already
> been submitted on 08/25 to Stéphane and were then under review.  I
> responded to you to that effect on 09/09 along with the reason for the
> original failure and a pointer to my patches that had been posted to the
> list.
>
> The patches are still being reviewed as he's been exceptionally busy
> lately and the patches are fairly involved and involved some
> disagreements in approach which were discussed in private E-Mail between
> the involved parties.
>
> The patches have not been committed to git master to date and he's
> working on integrating the changes.  As a consequence, the answer I gave
> to you on 09/09 on the -devel list remains the same and is equally
> applicable to 1.1.0alpha1 and to git master...
>
> i.e. ... You can either apply the patches I posted to the -devel list
> several weeks ago or you can wait for Stéphane to commit the fully
> integrated patches to git master.  At this time, applying my changes
> will result in some patch warnings due to others submitting some warning
> changes in parallel patches.
>
> I would recommend monitoring the -devel list for further (cough)
> developments (yes, pun intended).
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
> On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 12:06 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>> This was due to a refactoring of the upstart init network code nearly
>> a
>> month ago by someone, AFAIK, not currently on the list which created
>> some files in an incorrect location and the creation of dependencies
>> on
>> it in the systemd code.  Patches for this fax paux have been submitted
>> by me and Stéphane is currently evaluating my patch set to correct the
>> problems that were created by the earlier submission by another that
>> inadvertently broke all the rpm based systems.  This was reported
>> several weeks ago and I submitted my fix, after some private
>> discussion,
>> on 08/25.
>>
>> Please review the following thread, starting on 08/25/2014, on this
>> list
>> for the patches and some discussion...
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Philip
>> _______________________________________________
>> lxc-users mailing list
>> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
>> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>>
>
> --
> Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 |  mhw at WittsEnd.com
>    /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/          | (678) 463-0932 |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
>    NIC whois: MHW9          | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
>  PGP Key: 0x674627FF        | possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users