[lxc-users] [Wishlist] libvir and lxc and confusion? ? ?
Stéphane Graber
stgraber at ubuntu.com
Tue Feb 11 15:24:25 UTC 2014
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 08:44:54AM -0500, TuxRaiderPen wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 05:16:56 bogdan.purcareata at freescale.com wrote:
> > On the LXC 1.0 roadmap page [1] this feature is listed. What's the status
> > on it - is it still a desired component for upcoming LXC versions?
> > [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LXC/1.0-roadmap
>
> I read this and then read various articles like Linux Format did about libvirt
> being a "GUI frontend" to lxc and then various things about lxc-libvirt being
> "different" and then something about if you have existing lxc setup you can
> control them via libvirt by creating the needed file(s) this way....
>
> So I am confused...
>
> I find lxc useful for some things I normally would setup VMware Player to do...
> managing these via the tools at least in my current setup based on 12.04 ESR
> KUbuntu (I run a highly customized distro which is imaged to each system)..
>
> I've seen another GUI tool which looked interesting too but requires a version
> of lxc later than available right now...and while the lxc CLI tools are
> fine.... some of the GUI stuff could be of use as well...
>
> So I am looking to understand the diffrences of this lxc-libvirt stuff v. lxc? ?
> ?
The main goal behind this todo item was to get liblxc support into
OpenStack which is now being done in a different way (directly as an
OpenStack plugin, bypassing the libvirt layer which is more suited to
handling VMs than containers).
I think I've already said so here a dozen time but let's clarify it
again, libvirt-lxc and lxc are entirely different projects which
unfortunately happen to share a name, there's not a single line of code
in common between those two and their feature set is widely different
too.
While it'd be nice to have libvirt-lxc be based on liblxc, that doesn't
seem to be the direction that project is currently heading towards.
Having a second libvirt driver would be an option but given that
OpenStack is now working towards a container API which will let us get
direct LXC integration, there's not many insentive for us to divert time
from other work in order to work on such a plugin.
--
Stéphane Graber
Ubuntu developer
http://www.ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20140211/0a49a4d5/attachment.pgp>
More information about the lxc-users
mailing list