[lxc-users] Router inside LXC with "lxc.network.type = phys" to the WAN-port

[Thomas Huber]

Am 31.01.2014 um 20:28 schrieb Leonid Isaev <lisaev at umail.iu.edu>:

> On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:26:30 +0100
> Thomas Huber <miraculli at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> [...]
>> 
>> I see your point and thats why I´m asking.
>> The Idea was not only to protect the host but also the other running
>> service / VMs:
> 
> Right.
> 
>> - KVM with Window2008R2 an MS-SQL running inside
>> - a service for Wifi-Managment with multiple accesspoint running inside JVM
> 
> So, the host is also an AP, i.e. there are wireless NICs? 

No. There several APs connected by LAN.  http://www.ubnt.com/unifi

> 
>> - samba
>> 
>> would your start the services just with lxc-execute or setup a complete
>> container?
> 
> I'd create a standalone container for each group of services. The idea is to
> have a maximally slim host installation and "vanilla" containers which hence do
> not need to be backed up (it is easier to recreate the container than to
> recover it). For example, samba and cups can go to one container.

That was my first idea and so i though about putting the "router-group" also into a container.
Do you think it is necessary to put the kvm-qemu tools also inside e a container?
 
> 
> The problem which I see with using lxc-execute is that you can't have a
> minimal host. Indeed, in the same example of samba, you'll need all its
> dependencies installed.

that´s a got hint…. thank you!

—
mirac

> 
> Cheers,
> L.
> 
> -- 
> Leonid Isaev
> GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D
> Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE  775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20140201/a95a254e/attachment.html>