[Lxc-users] postgres

[Papp Tamas]

On 05/14/2012 12:10 PM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:

hi,

> Sorry for the useless noise. 

Easy to be confused about this paramaters.

> Ah, right. In that case, perhaps postgresql somehow allocates different
> amounts of SHM based on some autodetection mechanism or other
> circumstance, and lxc is somehow messing up this mechanism?

Yes, that's the point.

> I'm just guessing here, perhaps someone with better lxc-fu has some more
> useful contribution... :-)

Actually I'm curious about other users experience related to psql+lxc.

tamas