[Lxc-users] lxc-fedora in 0.8.0-rc1 - bugfix
Serge Hallyn
serge.hallyn at canonical.com
Thu Apr 5 18:30:30 UTC 2012
Oh, now I see what you are saying.
Yes, i was aware of that. What I'm asking is, without the patch he
suggests, does the yum --installroot fail for him altogether, or does
he (as I have) end up with a fedora container in which any yum
commands require you to add '--releasever=x'.
-serge
Quoting rhanna at informatiq.org (rhanna at informatiq.org):
> the releasever is passed as an opt to the script -R
>
> --
> Sent from my Nokia N9On 5.4.2012 18:25 Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting István Király - LaKing (d250 at yahoo.com):
> > Hello.
> >
> > The lxc-fedora template in 0.8.0-rc1 has still a bug, the script aborts, due to a missing variable for yum: relreasever.
> >
> > To fix, edit the file at line 112
> >
> >
> > YUM="yum --installroot $INSTALL_ROOT -y --nogpgcheck --releasever=$release"
> >
> > Just mention it, so it can be fixed in the final release.
> >
> > Greetings,
> > István Király
>
> Thanks, István. Does adding the --releasever make the resulting chroot
> know it's releasever, or does the lxc-fedora script fail for you
> altogether with out?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to
> monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second
> resolution app monitoring today. Free.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Lxc-users mailing list
> Lxc-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
>
More information about the lxc-users
mailing list