[lxc-devel] [PATCH 3/9] lxc_start: ERROR if container is already running.
Tycho Andersen
tycho.andersen at canonical.com
Tue Oct 21 14:32:47 UTC 2014
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 02:29:28PM +0000, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Tycho Andersen (tycho.andersen at canonical.com):
> > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:16:54AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> > > We should exit with a error when starting a running container.
> >
> > Is this intentional? I just noticed it when pulling from master that
> > it breaks some of my scripts. Are we sure it doesn't break anything
> > else?
>
> Which scripts does it break?
No public ones, just some that I wrote myself. Just curious if the
behavior change was intentional or not (I prefer the previous behavior
:)
Tycho
> > Tycho
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com>
> > > Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn at ubuntu.com>
> > > ---
> > > src/lxc/lxc_start.c | 4 ++++
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_start.c b/src/lxc/lxc_start.c
> > > index e836325..9a05356 100644
> > > --- a/src/lxc/lxc_start.c
> > > +++ b/src/lxc/lxc_start.c
> > > @@ -276,6 +276,10 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > + if (c->is_running(c)) {
> > > + ERROR("Container is already running.");
> > > + goto out;
> > > + }
> > > /*
> > > * We should use set_config_item() over &defines, which would handle
> > > * unset c->lxc_conf for us and let us not use lxc_config_define_load()
> > > --
> > > 1.8.4.2
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > lxc-devel mailing list
> > > lxc-devel at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> > > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
More information about the lxc-devel
mailing list