[lxc-devel] Fwd: Re: [lxc-users] container/config: why "lxc." in front of config option names?

[lxc at zitta.fr]

Le 01/02/2014 17:13, Michael H. Warfield a écrit :
> On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 12:59 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: 
>> Hi folks,
>> The "lxc." in the config option names seems to be constant, so I wonder
>> what it is good for?
> It allows us to extend the configuration file for other scripts and
> such.  For a long while I've used it for autoboot options, before
> Stéphane added them in runup for the 1.0 release (still only in GIT).
>
> So my scripts would used something like this:
>
> # lxc-boot.autoboot...
> # =0 => Do not boot automatically
> # >0 => Boot order/phase
> # <0 => Disabled
> lxc-boot.autoboot = 10
> lxc-boot.delay = 2
>
> lxc-system.description = "Alcove system"
>
> The core lxc code would then ignore anything in the lxc-boot or
> lxc-system domain as not relevant.
>
> For at least the autoboot case, Stéphane has added these options for the
> new lxc-autostart command in the upcoming 1.0.0 release:
>
> lxc.start.auto = 1
> lxc.start.order = 1
> lxc.start.delay = 10
> lxc.group = X-Force
>
> But...  If you add them now to a configuration file for 0.9.0, it's
> going to hurl chunks at you and tell you that you have invalid options.


Changing ML from user to dev...

Perhaps, We could use this in lxc/default.conf for template default options, like :

template.gentoo.mirror = http://repos.loc
template.ubuntu.release = precise

It could help with a problem we had at work because servers don't have internet access and we have internal ubuntu mirrors

Guillaume ZITTA