[lxc-users] Running unprotected system container

[Koehler, Yannick]

Exact, in the context that you are using system container as intended and supported, altering the kernel makes little sense, but that is not what I am doing here.

As I have indicated, I am intending to use the container as a way to run an OS in it that will totally control the kernel, leaving the host as actually more like a system container itself in which it won't play with the kernel.

This certainly falls in the unsupported use of system containers yet at the same time so far the issue I am hitting seems to have configuration items related to them that I can play with and get to my liking as long as I understand them and adjust those to the proper value.

Basically I am using a hammer to nail a screw and it may look strange from an outsider views but it makes sense from my viewpoint given my requirements.

--
Yannick Koehler
________________________________
From: lxc-users <lxc-users-bounces at lists.linuxcontainers.org> on behalf of Andrey Repin <anrdaemon at yandex.ru>
Sent: June 15, 2020 10:51 AM
To: Saint Michael <lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org>; All <lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org>
Subject: Re: [lxc-users] Running unprotected system container

Greetings, Saint Michael!

> I need to load kernel modules, etc. It has to be on equal footing with the host
> ..

See my other reply to the thread. "I need to load kernel modules" is a direct
contradiction to kernel-agnostic premise of containers.


--
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Monday, June 15, 2020 17:50:09

Sorry for my terrible english...

_______________________________________________
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20200615/67beb423/attachment.htm>