[lxc-users] change 'lxc [cmd]' to 'lxd [comd]' (for LXD)

Anders Magnus Andersen a.m.andersen at me.com
Tue Apr 18 12:54:49 UTC 2017


On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 13:45 +0300, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Simos Xenitellis!
> 
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:34 AM, gunnar.wagner
> > <gunnar.wagner at netcologne.de> wrote:
> > > just saw it again ....
> > > 
> > > 'lxc-[cmd]'   (LXC Containers)   vs
> > > 'lxc [cmd]'   (LXD Containers)
> > > 
> > > it would be so much less confusing whether LXD would just
> > > use   'lxd [cmd]'
> > > instead of   'lxc [cmd]'   syntax
> > > 
> > > - Am I (being a total novice and all) alone with this thought?
> > > - any benefit from the current   'lxc [cmd]'   command syntax for
> > > LXD
> > > containers?
> > > 
> > > just wondering. Maybe it's an age-old discussion here but as
> > > someone diving
> > > new into this ... it hits you right in the face
> > > 
> > I think the issue here is this, is there any growing interest in
> > LXC1
> > (those lxc-[cmd] commands)?
> > LXD/LXC is more usable than legacy LXC (i.e. LXC1).
> 
> LXC requires less infrastructure and easier to manage.
> I prefer it over LXD for persistent deployments.
> 
> 

I agree, for now, with the lack of "easy to get" documentation. LXC is
still very much alive.


More information about the lxc-users mailing list