[lxc-users] Big snapshots abort...
Michel Dubé
md at humanity.net
Thu Dec 1 21:17:53 UTC 2016
Hey Guido !!!
I guess you got it man. Same rsync version on my server. I have to give it
a new try later this week and I come back with feedback.
A+
Michel
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
2016-12-01 12:50 GMT-05:00 Guido Jäkel <G.Jaekel at dnb.de>:
> Hi,
>
> Does the rsync use -z? Is it the bug filed at
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/1384503 ?
>
> greetings
>
> Guido
>
> On 01.12.2016 13:28, Michel Dubé wrote:
> > Hi Rémy,
> >
> > There is a lot of space on that server and I did an rsync of that
> container
> > manually.
> >
> > The strange thing is that at the end of the snapshot, all the files and
> > directories had been copied to the snapshot directory but the snapshot
> > process initiated by the snapshot command never got terminated. So I made
> > several tries to understand what was going on. Every time, after I killed
> > the snapshot command, the related container's snapshot directory got
> > deleted. That's why I reported the issue.
> >
> > Like I said in a previous message, I will move all the stuff hosted on
> that
> > server to another one (ZFS) soon. So I don't really care about the
> problem
> > but may be someone else could bump on it too. I don't know.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Michel Dubé
> >
> >
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
> >
> > 2016-12-01 5:38 GMT-05:00 Rémy Dernat <remy.d1 at gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Just a stupid question; did you try to copy 25GB on this space with
> rsync
> >> otherwise ? I mean it could be a "not enough space" problem or any other
> >> issue not directly related to the snapshot itself.
> >>
> >> Kind regards
> >>
> >> 2016-12-01 11:15 GMT+01:00 Michel Dubé <md at humanity.net>:
> >>
> >>> You're right, I don't use ZFS on this system. In fact, this is the
> first
> >>> LXC system I setup more than one year ago and I wanted to keep it as
> simple
> >>> as possible.
> >>> But I plan to move all these containers to a new server (16.04) using
> ZFS
> >>> soon.
> >>> Thanks Serge.
> >>>
> >>> Michel
> >>>
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
> >>>
> >>> 2016-11-25 22:36 GMT-05:00 Serge Victor <dr.serge at random.re>:
> >>>
> >>>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Michel Dubé <md at humanity.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> error: rsync failed: rsync: [sender] write error: Broken pipe (32)
> >>>>> rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at
> io.c(837)
> >>>>> [sender=3.1.0]
> >>>>
> >>>> What is the underlaying filesystem? I bet you don't use ZFS or BTRFS,
> >>>> which have snapshotting features built-in, why?
> >>>>
> >>>> S.
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> lxc-users mailing list
> >>>> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> >>>> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> lxc-users mailing list
> >>> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> >>> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lxc-users mailing list
> >> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> >> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lxc-users mailing list
> > lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20161201/6f3f560f/attachment.html>
More information about the lxc-users
mailing list