[lxc-users] Big snapshots abort...

[Rémy Dernat]

Hi,

Just a stupid question; did you try to copy 25GB on this space with rsync
otherwise ? I mean it could be a "not enough space" problem or any other
issue not directly related to the snapshot itself.

Kind regards

2016-12-01 11:15 GMT+01:00 Michel Dubé <md at humanity.net>:

> You're right, I don't use ZFS on this system. In fact, this is the first
> LXC system I setup more than one year ago and I wanted to keep it as simple
> as possible.
> But I plan to move all these containers to a new server (16.04) using ZFS
> soon.
> Thanks Serge.
>
> Michel
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
>
> 2016-11-25 22:36 GMT-05:00 Serge Victor <dr.serge at random.re>:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Michel Dubé <md at humanity.net> wrote:
>>
>> > error: rsync failed: rsync: [sender] write error: Broken pipe (32)
>> > rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(837)
>> > [sender=3.1.0]
>>
>> What is the underlaying filesystem? I bet you don't use ZFS or BTRFS,
>> which have snapshotting features built-in, why?
>>
>> S.
>> _______________________________________________
>> lxc-users mailing list
>> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
>> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20161201/30e0f9e3/attachment.html>