[lxc-users] lxd in Debian

[P. Lowe]

Why on earth does lxd depend on "golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-dev"?

I'm also wondering, why should lxd even depend on systemd?

-P. Lowe

Quoting "Fajar A. Nugraha" <list at fajar.net>:

> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Micky Del Favero <micky at mesina.net> wrote:
>> Paul Dino Jones <spacefreak18 at brak.space> writes:
>>
>>> So, i see lxc 2.0 has made it's way into Stretch and Jessie backports,
>>> but I don't see any activity on lxd. Is this going to happen in time
>>> for the Stretch freeze?
>>
>> I've packaged LXD for Jessie (Devuan's, but the same applied to Debian),
>> here I've explain what I've do:
>> http://micky.it/log/compiling-lxd-on-devuan.html
>> https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/2016-July/012045.html
>> if nobody will package LXD you can do it yourself follow my way.
>
>
> I'm confused.
>
> How did you managed to get it build, when the source from
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial-updates/lxd has
>
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9),
>                dh-apparmor,
>                dh-golang,
>                dh-systemd,
>                golang-go,
>                golang-go.crypto-dev,
>                golang-context-dev,
>                golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-dev,
>                golang-github-gorilla-mux-dev,
>                golang-github-gosexy-gettext-dev,
>                golang-github-mattn-go-colorable-dev,
>                golang-github-mattn-go-sqlite3-dev,
>                golang-github-olekukonko-tablewriter-dev,
>                golang-github-pborman-uuid-dev,
>                golang-gocapability-dev,
>                golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3-dev,
>                golang-gopkg-inconshreveable-log15.v2-dev,
>                golang-gopkg-lxc-go-lxc.v2-dev,
>                golang-gopkg-tomb.v2-dev,
>                golang-goprotobuf-dev,
>                golang-petname-dev,
>                golang-yaml.v2-dev,
>                golang-websocket-dev,
>                help2man,
>                lxc-dev (>= 1.1.0~),
>                pkg-config,
>                protobuf-compiler
>
> and https://packages.debian.org/petname returns zero result?
> altlinux's lxd rpm (which I use as starting point for my c6 build) has
> similar requirement, and when I tried removing golang-petname-dev
> requirement when building for centos, the build failed, so I had to
> create a new rpm package for that.
>
> --
> Fajar
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users