[lxc-users] Red Hat GM appears to make argumeny for system containers over application containers

[brian mullan]

This is not dissing Docker but this discussion:

http://www.cbronline.com/news/enterprise-it/software/containers-debunked-devops-security-and-why-containers-will-not-replace-virtual-machines-4977492?src=fridayfive1email

With the GM of Red Hat's Integrated Solutions points out the weakness in
Docker's application repo model in regards to security patches being
by-passed as time goes on.

His statements also imply in a way (at least I read it that way) that OS
containers at least give you the ability to apply security patches even if
the original image author hasn't updated that image himself.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20160821/33234163/attachment.html>