[lxc-users] lxc.start.order honored in reverse
Jean-Gabriel Gill-Couture
jeangabriel.gc at gmail.com
Wed Mar 4 13:48:18 UTC 2015
>From man lxc.container.conf
When the system boots with the LXC service enabled, it will first attempt
to boot any containers with lxc.start.auto == 1 that is a member of the
"onboot" group. The startup will be in order of lxc.start.order. If an
lxc.start.delay has been specified, that delay will be honored before
attempting to start the next container to give the current container time
to begin initialization and reduce overloading the host system. After
starting the members of the "onboot" group, the LXC system will proceed to
boot containers with lxc.start.auto == 1 which are not members of any group
(the NULL group) and proceed as with the onboot group.
Which is very explicit that what you are experiencing is not the default
behavior. I 've never had a problem with that.
Is it possible that the order is respected but the first containers are
just slower to start up?
2015-02-28 20:52 GMT-05:00 Bostjan Skufca <bostjan at a2o.si>:
> I understood from man pages that lxc.start.order setting should cause
> containers to start in ascending order (lower the value, earlier the
> startup). It turns out that with 1.0.7 this acts more like priority - the
> higher the value, the sooner container starts.
>
> Is anyone else experiencing this with lxc-autostart? Is this intended
> behaviour?
>
> b.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20150304/fdd6b5fa/attachment.html>
More information about the lxc-users
mailing list