[lxc-users] lxd: "-B backingstore" equivalent?

[Mark Constable]

On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 03:54:06 PM Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Does this mean that btrfs is considered a second class option
> > with the primary focus and most of your future lxd backing
> > store effort being put into LVM?
> 
> It is, for a few reasons.

Sorry to persist with this but would you mind elaborating briefly on
some of those reasons or point me to further discussion please?

I have invested heavily in btrfs so I am a little "shocked" at this
news. If I want to stick to btrfs then would I be better off relying
on legacy lxc?