[lxc-users] lxd: "-B backingstore" equivalent?

[Mark Constable]

On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 07:58:02 AM Tycho Andersen wrote:
> LVM support is Coming Soon, and making it fast and stable
> will likely be a primary focus.

On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 01:57:34 PM Serge Hallyn wrote:
> What will become the recommended backing store is actualy
> not yet implemented, but will be soon - that is lvm with
> thinpools.

Does this mean that btrfs is considered a second class option
with the primary focus and most of your future lxd backing
store effort being put into LVM?

If so then what would be the reason to "abandon" btrfs as a
preferred backing store (if it ever was)?