[lxc-users] Configuring LXC containers to use a host bridge under CentOS 7
Peter Steele
pwsteele at gmail.com
Sun Aug 30 06:07:47 UTC 2015
On 08/29/2015 03:26 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha <list at fajar.net
> <mailto:list at fajar.net>> wrote:
>
> - on the host: "tcpdump -n -i bond0 172.16.0.1" and "tcpdump -n -i
> veth5BJDXU 172.16.0.1" (substitute the veth name with whatever you
> have)
>
>
> It should be "tcpdump -n -i bond0 host 172.16.0.1" and "tcpdump -n -i
> veth5BJDXU host 172.16.0.1"
>
I will give this a try tomorrow. Just as an FYI, we originally were
running libvirt-qemu under CentOS and were using full VMs to host our
software. The VMs were setup to use bridged networking and had full
visibility of the subnet they were part of, and could also access the
external internet. We do not use iptables, selinix, or apparmor. We did
not use the virbr0 interface defined by default by libvirt since this
provides only NAT based addressing. We needed our VMs to have full
access to their host's subnet. The br0 bridge is configured on the host
using the ifcfg-br0 file I posted earlier, along with associated files
for ifcfg-bond0 and one or more ifcfg-ethN interface files depending on
how many NICs are tied to the bond interface.
The VMs have only a single /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
file. This does not directly mention the br0 interface but are of course
indirectly connected to the br0 bridge interface of their host. From the
VM's perspective, they see themselves as a system with a single NIC.
We switched to libvirt-lxc and this was basically plug-n-play. No
changes were needed to the CentOS networking configuration we were using
with our VM based system on either the host or the containers. The
switch to containers was ultimately painless, and we were even able to
use the same basic CentOS template, with only a few changes to make it
container friendly (such as tweaking the /etc/fstab file).
Our decision to switch to "stock" LXC, as I mentioned in my original
post, is primarily motivated by the fact that libvirt-lxc is being
deprecated. I assume the switch to LXC should go relatively painly as
well, but there is clearly more of a learning curve. The fact that our
containers cannot access their host's subnet I suspect is a missing
parameter in the container's config file. My gut feeling is that they
are not talking to the br0 bridge, despite this being specifically
listed in their config files. I'll run the suggest tcpdump tests to see
if I can better understand what's going on.
Peter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20150829/2dd25578/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the lxc-users
mailing list