[lxc-users] Compile fails under Fedora

Fajar A. Nugraha list at fajar.net
Mon Sep 22 02:33:22 UTC 2014 

Echoing jjs' response, I really wouldn't run anything "critical" on fedora
or anything that has less than three years support life time (which
includes non-lts ubuntu). You just found out one of the reasons: on
"bleeding-edge" distros, stuff are not as thouroughly tested.

Since you already have centos 7 and ubuntu lts, just use either of them as
your container host. If an app needs F20 (for whatever reason), run them
inside a container.

Anyway, what version of lxc do you run on centos 7? The same packages
should be usable on F20. And if you absolutely need latest lxc git, either
do the things I mentioned earlier (patch yourself, yada yada yada) or use
one of your ubuntu systems with daily ppa.

-- 
Fajar

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 6:33 AM, CDR <venefax at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, 1/3 in Fedora, 1/3 in Centos 7, and 1/3 in Ubuntu 14.04
> But that is the server, 100% of my apps are in LXC
> I need to simplify it, though.
>
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:36 PM, jjs - mainphrame <jjs at mainphrame.com>
> wrote:
> > Yikes! you're running critical line of business apps on fedora?
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 4:35 PM, CDR <venefax at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This technology is being used on critical line-of-business
> >> applications, at least in my company.
> >> I wish that Stepahane or other would follow a more predictable
> >> patch-releasing schedule.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Michael H. Warfield <mhw at wittsend.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, 2014-09-20 at 03:23 -0400, CDR wrote:
> >> >> I did a "git pull" and ´when I issued a "make rpm", it failed
> >> >>
> >> >> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> >> >>    /usr/lib/systemd/system/lxc-net.service
> >> >> RPM build errors:
> >> >>     File listed twice:
> >> >> /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/_lxc-0.1-py3.3.egg-info
> >> >>     File listed twice:
> >> >> /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/_lxc.cpython-33m.so
> >> >>     File listed twice:
> >> >> /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/lxc/__init__.py
> >> >>     File listed twice:
> >> >> /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/lxc/__pycache__
> >> >>     File listed twice:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/lxc/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-33.pyc
> >> >>     File listed twice:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> /usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/lxc/__pycache__/__init__.cpython-33.pyo
> >> >>     File listed twice: /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-autostart-helper
> >> >>     File listed twice: /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-devsetup
> >> >>     File listed twice: /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-user-nic
> >> >>     Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> >> >>    /usr/lib/systemd/system/lxc-net.service
> >> >> make: *** [rpm] Error 1
> >> >>
> >> >> Any idea how can I compile the software?
> >> >
> >> > You raised this issue on 08/09 for 1.1.0alpha1 under Fedora 20.  At
> that
> >> > time yours was the second report and I was already looking into it.
> You
> >> > then raised the issue again on the -devel list on 09/05 for
> 1.1.0alpha1
> >> > under CentOS 7 - exact same issue.  At that time the patches had
> already
> >> > been submitted on 08/25 to Stéphane and were then under review.  I
> >> > responded to you to that effect on 09/09 along with the reason for the
> >> > original failure and a pointer to my patches that had been posted to
> the
> >> > list.
> >> >
> >> > The patches are still being reviewed as he's been exceptionally busy
> >> > lately and the patches are fairly involved and involved some
> >> > disagreements in approach which were discussed in private E-Mail
> between
> >> > the involved parties.
> >> >
> >> > The patches have not been committed to git master to date and he's
> >> > working on integrating the changes.  As a consequence, the answer I
> gave
> >> > to you on 09/09 on the -devel list remains the same and is equally
> >> > applicable to 1.1.0alpha1 and to git master...
> >> >
> >> > i.e. ... You can either apply the patches I posted to the -devel list
> >> > several weeks ago or you can wait for Stéphane to commit the fully
> >> > integrated patches to git master.  At this time, applying my changes
> >> > will result in some patch warnings due to others submitting some
> warning
> >> > changes in parallel patches.
> >> >
> >> > I would recommend monitoring the -devel list for further (cough)
> >> > developments (yes, pun intended).
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Mike
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 12:06 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> >> >> This was due to a refactoring of the upstart init network code nearly
> >> >> a
> >> >> month ago by someone, AFAIK, not currently on the list which created
> >> >> some files in an incorrect location and the creation of dependencies
> >> >> on
> >> >> it in the systemd code.  Patches for this fax paux have been
> submitted
> >> >> by me and Stéphane is currently evaluating my patch set to correct
> the
> >> >> problems that were created by the earlier submission by another that
> >> >> inadvertently broke all the rpm based systems.  This was reported
> >> >> several weeks ago and I submitted my fix, after some private
> >> >> discussion,
> >> >> on 08/25.
> >> >>
> >> >> Please review the following thread, starting on 08/25/2014, on this
> >> >> list
> >> >> for the patches and some discussion...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Philip
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> lxc-users mailing list
> >> >> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> >> >> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 |  mhw at WittsEnd.com
> >> >    /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/          | (678) 463-0932 |
> >> > http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
> >> >    NIC whois: MHW9          | An optimist believes we live in the best
> >> > of all
> >> >  PGP Key: 0x674627FF        | possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of
> >> > it!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > lxc-users mailing list
> >> > lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> >> > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lxc-users mailing list
> >> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> >> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lxc-users mailing list
> > lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20140922/c69a63c9/attachment.html>

More information about the lxc-users mailing list