[lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

[coolnodje]

done, this is great and seems to be working fine, at least it's as expected.
I'll copy in some container now and check that everything is all right.

I understand now I wasn't probably enabling enough option during
./configure, but it seemed odd that even the very basic options like
--version would not be enabled.

Thanks a lot

> Nikola Kotur <mailto:kotnick at gmail.com>
> 20 May 2014 17:41
> On Tue, 20 May 2014 17:36:39 +0800
>
> Yes I do:
>
> (platform)root at lab:~# lxc-attach --version
> 1.0.3
>
> (platform)root at lab:~# lxc-ls --fancy
> NAME STATE IPV4 IPV6 AUTOSTART
> ----------------------------------
> ...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> Nikola Kotur <mailto:kotnick at gmail.com>
> 20 May 2014 17:02
> On Fri, 16 May 2014 10:43:11 +0200
>
> If needed, one can use my Debian packaging config here:
>
> https://github.com/kotnik/lxc/tree/debian-1.0.3
>
> That is a clean 1.0.3 version with functioning debian/ package
> directory and it builds with python3 but without lua (since I don't
> need it). To quickly build and test under wheezy:
>
> dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc -us
>
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> Wojciech Arabczyk <mailto:arabek at gmail.com>
> 16 May 2014 16:43
> It would be best, if you'd try to create a deb package from the source
> package in sid,
> and then install via dpkg. Sorry, but i don't have time to provide
> specific instructions.
> You'll have to dig it out yourself.
>
> With kind regards,
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> pozdrawiam
> Wojciech Arabczyk
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> coolnodje <mailto:coolnodje at gmail.com>
> 16 May 2014 11:26
> apt-get remove lxc did the job before compiling 1.0.3.
>
> there's nothing left in /usr/bin and `which lxc-create` confirms it
> comes from /usr/local/bin
>
> So I understand, as expected, there shouldn't be any discrepancy
> between the Ubuntu 1.0.3 packaged version and the one I compiled on
> Debian, right?
>
> Something must have gone wrong then: could the option I used
> --with-distro=debian make a difference during ./configure?
>
> Also, I'd like to have everything in standard "packaged lxc" location
> except for the binaries. Would ./configure --prefix=/
> --bindir=/usr/local would do ?
> The INSTALL file in the distrib is really well done and useful but a
> confirmation would be helpful.
>
> Thanks
>
> Wojciech Arabczyk <mailto:arabek at gmail.com>
> 15 May 2014 20:06
> Hi,
>
> have you uninstalled the packaged version of lxc prior to installing
> the version from sources?
>
> Most probably, the /usr/bin lxc takes precedence to the one you
> installed to /usr/local prefix from the sources,
>
> cheers,
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20140520/65c00659/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1208 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20140520/65c00659/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: postbox-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1154 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20140520/65c00659/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: compose-unknown-contact.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 770 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20140520/65c00659/attachment-0002.jpg>