[lxc-users] LXC Compilation fails under Suse Enterprise
Michael H. Warfield
mhw at WittsEnd.com
Wed May 7 15:50:23 UTC 2014
On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 11:26 -0400, CDR wrote:
> It is a local install.
> My guess is that the amount of memory in the box makes the 32 bit
> installer blow up/
> The bug is a month old. It was found to be a duplicate.
But they don't respin iso images based on updates. So, even if upstream
fixed the bug and it made it into an update rpm, the install images
would still have the bug. My next step would be to reduce the RAM (how
much RAM is in that 32 bit box?), install, update and reinstall the RAM.
If you had a working machine, you could always respin an updated iso
yourself but that's a lot of work (that's how I build NST run-live iso
images).
Regards,
Mike
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Michael H. Warfield <mhw at wittsend.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 16:36 -0400, CDR wrote:
> >> I opened the case.
> >> But now they say there is a previous bug. So I am about to install
> >> Ubuntu Server.
> >> I have no idea how to install Fedora on my box.
> >> This is is the bug
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065793
> >
> > Yeah, so you're using iSCSI? SCSI over IP?
> >
> >> If somebody has an idea, please let me know.
> >
> > Maybe try using some local storage and then mount the iSCSI after the
> > fact? I've never used it so I've never run into this before.
> >
> >> Philip
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mike
> >
> >> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Michael H. Warfield <mhw at wittsend.com> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:21 -0400, CDR wrote:
> >> >> The SUSE is SLES 11 SP3, the latest. Kernel is 3.0XX, but I manged to
> >> >> install kernel 3.14.2, he very latest and greatest.
> >> >> If I could compile LXC latest, I would use it. My client thinks it is great.
> >> >
> >> > Ok... That's good news at least.
> >> >
> >> >> I just uploaded the installation logs. This time they responded right away
> >> >
> >> > Uploaded them to the Bugzilla thing? Are you the OP on that Bugzilla
> >> > report?
> >> >
> >> >> Philip
> >> >
> >> > Regards.
> >> > Mike
> >> >
> >> >> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Michael H. Warfield <mhw at wittsend.com> wrote:
> >> >> > On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 13:33 -0400, CDR wrote:
> >> >> >> I am trying to use Fedora 20 and no luck. It does not even install in
> >> >> >> a production box.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094883
> >> >> >
> >> >> > That machine in question is significantly larger than my largest server.
> >> >> > His is 512GB RAM while I have only 64GB, he has 80 cores, and I only
> >> >> > have 16. Yeah, OK, I'm a bit jealous but... That's my primary
> >> >> > development engine with about 2 dozen LXC containers running on it
> >> >> > simultaneously of varying distros and running Fedora 20 for the host.
> >> >> > Are you also dying with this "pane is dead" error that he's reporting.
> >> >> > I've never seen that before.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > What are you trying to install it on? Specs - Processor, Cores, Ram,
> >> >> > Disk.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > IAC, that sounds like a Fedora problem, not an LXC problem. What was
> >> >> > the question again? The subject says "Compilation fails under Suse
> >> >> > Enterprise".
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Getting back to the original subject... Given your failure to build on
> >> >> > SLES raises a real questions about what version of SLES is on that
> >> >> > machine and what kernel rev is on it. Sounds like it is not even up to
> >> >> > date with what's been release and if you don't have a decent host (SLES
> >> >> > 11sp3) you're in for no end of migraines from it.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > How about "cat /etc/os-release" and "uname -a" for openers?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Regards,
> >> >> > Mike
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Philip
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Leonid Isaev <lisaev at umail.iu.edu> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Mon, 5 May 2014 23:07:45 -0400
> >> >> >> > CDR <venefax at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> I was under the impression that the LXC group could make this compile
> >> >> >> >> under every major distribution.
> >> >> >> >> Is there any way somebody from the LXC group can research this with
> >> >> >> >> the Suse guys? They surely
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Researching this is _your_ task. Here is a hint:
> >> >> >> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2009-01/msg00011.html .
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> will talk to you people, but not to a customer, unless I pay support fees.
> >> >> >> >> I imagine I need to install a newer autconf or automake
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> rpm -qa | grep auto
> >> >> >> >> automake-1.10.1-4.131.9.1
> >> >> >> >> autoconf-2.63-1.158
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > You imagine right. Don't compile git master on an ancient sles: either use a
> >> >> >> > tagged release e.g. 0.x.y, or get a proper distro for the host.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Cheers,
> >> >> >> > --
> >> >> >> > Leonid Isaev
> >> >> >> > GPG fingerprints: DA92 034D B4A8 EC51 7EA6 20DF 9291 EE8A 043C B8C4
> >> >> >> > C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | mhw at WittsEnd.com
> >> >> > /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
> >> >> > NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
> >> >> > PGP Key: 0x674627FF | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > lxc-users mailing list
> >> >> > lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> >> >> > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> lxc-users mailing list
> >> >> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> >> >> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | mhw at WittsEnd.com
> >> > /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
> >> > NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
> >> > PGP Key: 0x674627FF | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > lxc-users mailing list
> >> > lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> >> > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> lxc-users mailing list
> >> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> >> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> >
> > --
> > Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | mhw at WittsEnd.com
> > /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
> > NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
> > PGP Key: 0x674627FF | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lxc-users mailing list
> > lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
--
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 | mhw at WittsEnd.com
/\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
PGP Key: 0x674627FF | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 482 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20140507/f3489440/attachment.sig>
More information about the lxc-users
mailing list