[lxc-users] LXC Compilation fails under Suse Enterprise

[CDR]

The SUSE is SLES 11 SP3, the latest. Kernel is 3.0XX, but I manged to
install kernel 3.14.2, he very latest and greatest.
If I could compile LXC latest, I would use it. My client thinks it is great.

I just uploaded the installation logs. This time they responded right away

Philip

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Michael H. Warfield <mhw at wittsend.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 13:33 -0400, CDR wrote:
>> I am trying to use Fedora 20 and no luck. It does not even install in
>> a production box.
>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094883
>
> That machine in question is significantly larger than my largest server.
> His is 512GB RAM while I have only 64GB, he has 80 cores, and I only
> have 16.  Yeah, OK, I'm a bit jealous but...  That's my primary
> development engine with about 2 dozen LXC containers running on it
> simultaneously of varying distros and running Fedora 20 for the host.
> Are you also dying with this "pane is dead" error that he's reporting.
> I've never seen that before.
>
> What are you trying to install it on?  Specs - Processor, Cores, Ram,
> Disk.
>
> IAC, that sounds like a Fedora problem, not an LXC problem.  What was
> the question again?  The subject says "Compilation fails under Suse
> Enterprise".
>
> Getting back to the original subject...  Given your failure to build on
> SLES raises a real questions about what version of SLES is on that
> machine and what kernel rev is on it.  Sounds like it is not even up to
> date with what's been release and if you don't have a decent host (SLES
> 11sp3) you're in for no end of migraines from it.
>
> How about "cat /etc/os-release" and "uname -a" for openers?
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
>> Philip
>
>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Leonid Isaev <lisaev at umail.iu.edu> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Mon, 5 May 2014 23:07:45 -0400
>> > CDR <venefax at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I was under the impression that the LXC group could make this compile
>> >> under every major distribution.
>> >> Is there any way somebody from the LXC group can research this with
>> >> the Suse guys? They surely
>> >
>> > Researching this is _your_ task. Here is a hint:
>> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2009-01/msg00011.html .
>> >
>> >> will talk to you people, but not to a customer,  unless I pay support fees.
>> >> I  imagine I need to install a newer autconf or automake
>> >>
>> >>  rpm -qa | grep auto
>> >> automake-1.10.1-4.131.9.1
>> >> autoconf-2.63-1.158
>> >
>> > You imagine right. Don't compile git master on an ancient sles: either use a
>> > tagged release e.g. 0.x.y, or get a proper distro for the host.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > --
>> > Leonid Isaev
>> > GPG fingerprints: DA92 034D B4A8 EC51 7EA6  20DF 9291 EE8A 043C B8C4
>> >                   C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE  775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
>
>
> --
> Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 |  mhw at WittsEnd.com
>    /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/          | (678) 463-0932 |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
>    NIC whois: MHW9          | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
>  PGP Key: 0x674627FF        | possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users