[lxc-users] LXC with X, specifically KDE v. VM
TuxRaiderPen
tuxraiderpen at wpascanner.com
Tue May 6 12:16:18 UTC 2014
On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 04:49:06 Dirk Geschke wrote:
>
> + ssh -X {container}
>
> And all these work even with unprivileged containers.
Thanks... that is pretty much the plan as per other message for LXC. (See
other other reply too.. Thanks though.. I do this for a ton of other stuff,
just not LXC right now. Most of these are headless servers running LAMP stuff
for "dev/testing" and then pushed to servers.
I am more interested in comments in re LXC v. VM setup... both are pretty
"heavy" in terms of solutions for the single issue I have... Unfortunately I
was pushed to this due to my vary persnickerty tastes in email clients. I like
that KMail doesn't deal with HaTeMailL, and just barfs all over it! :) Plus
the decades worth of mail spool, filters, and that KMail2 is just broken on
imports, and a long list of stuff not really cogent for this list/discussion.
I am thinking that LXC might actually have some advantages for the LONG TERM?
myabe not... I am just more curious to hear others.. Obviously this list is
probably leaning more to an LXC solution, but like I said both are really
killing gnats with an F-4 phantom and napalm. :) ;)
Any views, opinions, comments in re that LXC might be better, worse, even v. a
VM??? Just curious, as I probably am going the LXC route, as it gives me
another test use case. I found the LXC containers for LAMP dev/testing to be
quite a hit with my group v. a VM setup for them.
More information about the lxc-users
mailing list