[lxc-users] Lower Version ??

CDR venefax at gmail.com
Fri May 2 01:08:27 UTC 2014


I will wait until I can generate an RPM 1.0.4.
I don't feel good downgrading,since I am in semi-production.
Please let me as soon as you have the 1.04 code, with the patch in it,
so I may test.
My app is a Fedora container, and an inner Debian container that uses
the NAT provided by the outer container.
However, LXC should provide a NAT networking option, away from libvirt.
I imagine that there should be two kinds of NAT networking available
to a container. One where all the containers share the same NAT space,
one single subnet 192.168.X.X, and another more restrictive, where the
container only has its own set of private IP's, and cannot communicate
directly with its peers.
In both cases, there should a way to use port forwarding, which is
sorely lacking in libvirt.
By the way, LXC is going to largely replace full virtualization. This
is the second wave of the revolution.



On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Michael H. Warfield <mhw at wittsend.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 20:28 -0400, CDR wrote:
>> Dear Friends
>
>> I followed this instructions
>
>> git clone git://github.com/lxc/lxc
>> cd lxc
>> git am /path/to/0001-have-systemd-
>> service-call-lxc-autostart-via-script.patch
>> ./autogen.sh
>> ./configure
>> make rpm
>> yum reinstall ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/lxc*
>
>> but the RPMs genrated are of a lower version of what I had, compiled from code
>
>> I get now
>> /root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/lxc-1.0.0-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
>> /root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/lxc-devel-1.0.0-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
>> /root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/lxc-debuginfo-1.0.0-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
>> /root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/lxc-libs-1.0.0-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
>
>> but I have installed
>
>> rpm -qa | grep lxc
>> lxc-devel-1.0.3-1.fc20.x86_64
>> libvirt-daemon-driver-lxc-1.1.3.4-4.fc20.x86_64
>> lxc-libs-1.0.3-1.fc20.x86_64
>> lxc-debuginfo-1.0.3-1.fc20.x86_64
>> lxc-1.0.3-1.fc20.x86_64
>
>> Did I missed something?
>
> No, that's because git head is at 1.0.0 rolling and 1.0.3 is a stable
> branch.  We're trying (hoping) to get a few fixes in for you for the
> 1.0.4 branch.  It's been quite a discussion over on the -devel list over
> a couple of issues.  /;-/=/
>
> What I generally do is go into lxc.spec and modify the release and
> norm_rel to suit my needs.  So, right now, my release on my main server
> is actuall 1.0.0-14 from all the rebuilds I've been doing.  Since you've
> got 1.0.3 already on your system, I would recommend "downgrading" to
> your 1.0.0-1 and then bump from there or you'll run into conflicts if
> Fedora bumps their norm_rel.  Then you can "upgrade" to 1.0.4 when it's
> ready.
>
>> Thanks for your continued assistance.
>> Philip
>
> Thank you for the feedback.  We missed a couple of things and need to
> address a couple of things.  This has become very useful, IMNSHO.
>
> Regards,
> Mike
> --
> Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 |  mhw at WittsEnd.com
>    /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/          | (678) 463-0932 |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
>    NIC whois: MHW9          | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
>  PGP Key: 0x674627FF        | possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users


More information about the lxc-users mailing list