[lxc-users] LXC Service fails to start in Fedora

Dwight Engen dwight.engen at oracle.com
Thu May 1 15:44:46 UTC 2014


On Thu, 01 May 2014 11:30:02 -0400
"Michael H. Warfield" <mhw at WittsEnd.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 11:25 -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 11:19:28AM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 10:13 -0400, CDR wrote:
> > > > Actually, /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-startup is a missing object, not
> > > > a directory.
> > > > 
> > > > It seems that the code does not include the two objects, which
> > > > are the basis for the LXC service.
> > > > 
> > > > Any idea how can this be fixed?
> > > > 
> > > > lxc-stratup
> > > 
> > > You mean lxc-startup.  Yeah that seems to be missing.  I think we
> > > man have forgotten to glue a couple of pieces together.  Stéphane
> > > did the lxc-autostart stuff while I was working on the systemd
> > > service stuff. lxc-startup was a temporary shim until
> > > lxc-autostart became available. It wasn't intended to reach
> > > release.  Maybe we each thought the other was going to complete
> > > that connection or maybe we just weren't thinking about it at all.
> > > 
> > > As a first suggestion, edit the systemd service file:
> > > 
> > > /usr/lib/systemd/system/lxc.service
> > > 
> > > Change these lines:
> > > 
> > > ExecStart=/usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-startup start
> > > ExecStop=/usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-startup stop
> > > 
> > > To this:
> > > 
> > > ExecStart=/usr/bin/lxc-autostart -a
> > > ExecStop=/usr/bin/lxc-autostart -s
> 
> > Care to send a patch for that? :)
> 
> That must be a retorical question.
> 
> As soon as I can quickly get it tested.  I know you're on a deadline
> for 1.0.4.  I'm on it.

Hey guys, that will kinda work, but if the auto-started containers are
relying on the bridge setup by libvirt, they can get started before
libvirt has brought up the bridge even if we make this unit depend on
libvirtd.service because that service returns to systemd before the
bridge has been brought up.

What I've done is to call the sysvinit script from ExecStart= and
ExecStop=, and that avoids the problem for me since the sysvinit script
waits for the bridge. libvirt-guests.service/libvirt-guests.sh is a
similar arrangement where the same script is used as a sysvinit script
and is called by the .service file. If you want I can make
lxc's .service file do similar.

> > > Then try starting.
> > > 
> > > Let me know if that works.
> > > 
> > > I guess I didn't spot that in my environment because I have the
> > > shim present.  :-P
> > > 
> > > > lxc-devsetup
> > > 
> > > From what I see below, lxc-devsetup was there.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:05 AM, CDR <venefax at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >         I went ahead and created the directory, but I think
> > > > some code is missing. By the way, this is compiled source code.
> > > > I did create the RPMs and upgraded the distribution's RPM's
> > > >         
> > > >         systemctl status lxc.service
> > > >         lxc.service - LXC Container Initialization and Autoboot
> > > > Code Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/lxc.service;
> > > >         enabled)
> > > >            Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Thu
> > > > 2014-05-01 02:02:37 UTC; 17s ago
> > > >           Process: 106 ExecStart=/usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-startup
> > > > start (code=exited, status=203/EXEC)
> > > >           Process: 78 ExecStartPre=/usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-devsetup
> > > >         (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
> > > >          Main PID: 106 (code=exited, status=203/EXEC)
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > 
> > > That said that lxc-devsetup ran and returned status=0/SUCCESS
> > > 
> > > >         
> > > >         CGroup: /user.slice/user-0.slice/session-1.scope/system.slice/lxc.service
> > > >         
> > > >         May 01 02:02:37 nat-1 systemd[1]: Failed to start LXC
> > > >         Container Initialization and Autoboot Code.
> > > >         May 01 02:02:37 nat-1 systemd[1]: Unit lxc.service
> > > > entered failed state.
> > > >         May 01 02:02:37 nat-1 lxc-devsetup[78]: /dev is devtmpfs
> > > >         
> > > >         
> > > >         
> > > >         
> > > >         On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:58 AM, István Király
> > > > <LaKing at d250.hu> wrote:
> > > >                 I have no experience with the pre-packed rpm, I
> > > >                 usually build it from source ...
> > > >                 
> > > >                 
> > > >                 So my questions would be:
> > > >                 
> > > >                 
> > > >                 Can you create and start containers - without
> > > > the service running.
> > > >                 Does this directory exists, and what if not and
> > > > you create it? /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-startup
> > > >                 
> > > >                 
> > > >                 
> > > >                 
> > > >                 
> > > >                 
> > > >                 On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 5:57 AM, CDR
> > > >                 <venefax at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >                 
> > > >                         Dear Friends
> > > >                         I am using the latest version of LXC
> > > >                         
> > > >                         rpm -qa | grep lxc
> > > >                         lxc-devel-1.0.3-1.fc20.x86_64
> > > >                         libvirt-daemon-driver-lxc-1.1.3.4-4.fc20.x86_64
> > > >                         lxc-libs-1.0.3-1.fc20.x86_64
> > > >                         lxc-1.0.3-1.fc20.x86_64
> > > >                         lxc-debuginfo-1.0.3-1.fc20.x86_64
> > > >                         
> > > >                          systemctl start lxc.service
> > > >                         
> > > >                         
> > > >                         - Unit lxc.service has begun starting
> > > > up. Apr 30 15:51:49 nat-1 lxc-devsetup[8036]:
> > > >                         Creating /dev/.lxc
> > > >                         Apr 30 15:51:49 nat-1
> > > > lxc-devsetup[8036]: /dev is devtmpfs
> > > >                         Apr 30 15:51:49 nat-1
> > > > lxc-devsetup[8036]: Creating /dev/.lxc/user
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > That line, right there, is an echo out of lxc-devsetup.  That's
> > > obviously there.
> > > 
> > > >                         Apr 30 15:51:49 nat-1 systemd[8042]:
> > > > Failed at step EXEC spawning
> > > >                         /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-startup: No such
> > > > file or directory
> > > >                         -- Subject:
> > > >                         Process /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-startup
> > > > could not be executed
> > > >                         -- Defined-By: systemd
> > > >                         -- Support:
> > > >                         http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
> > > >                         --
> > > >                         -- The
> > > > process /usr/libexec/lxc/lxc-startup could not be executed and
> > > > failed. --
> > > >                         -- The error number returned while
> > > > executing this process is 2.
> > > >                         Apr 30 15:51:49 nat-1 systemd[1]:
> > > > lxc.service: main process exited,
> > > >                         code=exited, status=203/EXEC
> > > >                         Apr 30 15:51:49 nat-1 systemd[1]:
> > > > Failed to start LXC Container
> > > >                         Initialization and Autoboot Code.
> > > >                         -- Subject: Unit lxc.service has failed
> > > >                         -- Defined-By: systemd
> > > >                         -- Support:
> > > >                         http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
> > > >                         --
> > > >                         -- Unit lxc.service has failed.
> > > >                         
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Mike
> > > -- 
> > > Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 978-7061 |  mhw at WittsEnd.com
> > >    /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/          | (678) 463-0932 |
> > > http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/ NIC whois: MHW9          | An
> > > optimist believes we live in the best of all PGP Key:
> > > 0x674627FF        | possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > lxc-users mailing list
> > > lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> > > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > lxc-users mailing list
> > lxc-users at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
> 



More information about the lxc-users mailing list