[lxc-users] {Disarmed} Re: networking issue

[Tamas Papp]

On 01/27/2014 12:32 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Which is, in and of itself contradictory, since 10.1.0.0/8 can't be a /8
> and 10.2.0.0/8 can't be a /8.  Perhaps you need to clarify yoru network
> topology in more explicit details.

They would be /16

$ netmask -r 10.0.0.0/8
       10.0.0.0-10.255.255.255  (16777216)


 

> You're running a flat /8 broadcast domain?  I personally control a
> legacy (public) /16 and would never consider running even that space
> "flat" (it's heavily subnetted).  The logistics for such is crazy.

This topology is only a theoretical and simpl example, the real network
looks completely different.


tamas