[Lxc-users] Setting up server in lxc container for dummies

[Tony Su]

To be visible to outside the LAN does not require a second physical NIC,
there are a number of ways to do that binding to a single NIC.

The OP needs to post a more detailed description of his topology.

Tony
On Aug 3, 2013 4:49 PM, "Kevin LaTona" <lists at studiosola.com> wrote:

>
> Tony,
>
> You are correct I did make an assumption about the OP.
>
> When it mentioned wanting a container to be "visible from the outside".
>
> I made the assumption that meant from outside of the local LAN.
>
> Which may or may not be the end case.
>
>
> -Kevin
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 3, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Tony Su <tonysu at su-networking.com> wrote:
>
> > Kevin
> >
> > I don't see anywhere the OP described his Host as multi-homed, much
> > less that the Container would be.
> >
> > On general principles multiple NICs only make sense when connecting to
> > multiple <physical> networks, isolated from one another...
> >
> > But, given the information posted, that is a very big assumption. If
> > nothing of the like is described, then I assume only one physical NIC
> > connecting to a single network which can support any number of IP
> > addresses and bridged devices which could in turn support any number
> > of virtual networks with their own addresses.
> >
> > Tony
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Kevin LaTona <lists at studiosola.com>
> wrote:
> >> Tony,
> >>
> >> If the container is being made available to both a public ip connection
> and
> >> a private ip connection at the same time.
> >>
> >> Would it not require either 2 NICS's that are connected to 2 different
> >> networks.
> >>
> >> For example one would be running on a private bridged network and the
> other
> >> on a public bridged network via these different NIC cards.
> >>
> >> Or a router using NAT to punch a hole into the local network that this
> >> container is on?
> >>
> >> -Kevin
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Aug 1, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Tony Su <tonysu at su-networking.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: "Tony Su" <tonysu at su-networking.com>
> >> Date: Aug 1, 2013 8:56 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Lxc-users] Setting up server in lxc container for dummies
> >> To: "Kevin LaTona" <lists at studiosola.com>
> >> Cc:
> >>
> >> You don't need multiple hardware NICs.
> >> Just bind your Container network config to the same bridge device that
> >> connects to the proper physical network and configure your IP address
> in the
> >> Container if not already specified in your LXCconfig.
> >>
> >> Assumes you're configuring static addressing and not using DHCP.
> >>
> >> Tony
> >>
> >> On Jul 31, 2013 10:33 PM, "Kevin LaTona" <lists at studiosola.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Jul 31, 2013, at 8:24 PM, Dan Kegel <dank at kegel.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> There are plenty of web pages about this, but they seem to
> >>> assume that you've created the lxc config file by hand.
> >>> I have never done that; I just use whatever lxc-create creates.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I should also add that much of lxc files are created for you when
> creating
> >>> the container as you stated earlier.
> >>>
> >>> All I've been doing is tweaking these pre fab files to work in a
> bridged
> >>> static ip mode vs dhcp mode.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> In other words you are not going to have to be writing all the config
> >>> files from square one.
> >>>
> >>> Rather tweaking and adding a few lines here and there.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -Kevin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> Get your SQL database under version control now!
> >>> Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent
> >>> caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under
> >>> version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
> >>>
> >>>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Lxc-users mailing list
> >>> Lxc-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
> >>>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Get your SQL database under version control now!
> >> Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent
> >> caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under
> >> version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
> >>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________
> >> Lxc-users mailing list
> >> Lxc-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Get your SQL database under version control now!
> > Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent
> > caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under
> > version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
> >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lxc-users mailing list
> > Lxc-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20130803/da220690/attachment.html>