[Lxc-users] [lxc-devel] [systemd-devel] Unable to run systemd in an LXC / cgroup container.
Serge Hallyn
serge.hallyn at canonical.com
Mon Oct 29 09:18:45 UTC 2012
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (mhw at WittsEnd.com):
...
> Yeah, I don't think I "need to play a game like this" anymore. I'd have
> to go back through some old old E-Mails to see why I did that before. I
> seem to recall we were playing with all sorts of bind mount options for
> some PRIVATE thing or another. It may not be necessary at all any
> longer. IAC, it's minor to switch it back. I seem to recall switching
> back and forth using bind mounts several times back when that got done
> that way.
>
> I may play with the pre-mount hook just for giggles and see how that
> might work as well. Any idea why I was experiencing the problem with
> the mount hook when trying to populate /dev? I know it wouldn't have
The only idea I have is that perhaps your root is MS_SHARED by default?
Can you post the script you were using and the container config?
> worked because of the /dev/pts mount but I have more heartburn in that
> it looks like it ran too early and the mount on /dev had not even taken
> place at that time.
>
> > > I believe I can see why... You're doing the autodev populate prior to
> > > any of the mounts being performed, so that "private" root file system is
> > > not bound to the directory at that time.
> > >
> > > Drop that bind mount for the rootfs and this then worked like a charm:
> > >
> > > --
> > > lxc.rootfs = /srv/lxc/private/Alcove
> > > lxc.mount.entry=/home/shared /srv/lxc/private/Alcove/srv/shared none ro,bind 0 0
> > >
> > > lxc.autodev = 1
> > > --
> > >
> > > I think that rootfs directory bind was an effort to more fully match the
> > > OpenVZ behavior but also trying to deal with some of the read-only
> > > problems were where having in the past with shutdowns. If it won't
> > > work, it won't work and I won't miss it.
> > >
> > > I did see some errors setting up that dev...
> > >
> > > --
> > > [root at forest mhw]# lxc-start -n Alcove
> > > lxc-start: No such file or directory - failed to mount '/dev/pts/59'->'/usr/lib64/lxc/rootfs/dev/tty1'
> > > lxc-start: No such file or directory - failed to mount '/dev/pts/60'->'/usr/lib64/lxc/rootfs/dev/tty2'
> > > lxc-start: No such file or directory - failed to mount '/dev/pts/61'->'/usr/lib64/lxc/rootfs/dev/tty3'
> > > lxc-start: No such file or directory - failed to mount '/dev/pts/62'->'/usr/lib64/lxc/rootfs/dev/tty4'
> > > lxc-start: No such file or directory - failed to mount '/dev/pts/63'->'/usr/lib64/lxc/rootfs/dev/tty5'
> > > lxc-start: No such file or directory - failed to mount '/dev/pts/64'->'/usr/lib64/lxc/rootfs/dev/tty6'
> > > systemd 44 running in system mode. (+PAM +LIBWRAP +AUDIT +SELINUX +IMA +SYSVINIT +LIBCRYPTSETUP; fedora)
> > >
> > > Welcome to Fedora 17 (Beefy Miracle)!
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Not sure what that's all about but, since systemd isn't going to start
> > > getty's on the tty? interfaces anyways, it probably doesn't make much
> > > difference.
>
> > Oh, I see. Yeah, in the !lxc.ttydir case, when we created our own /dev
> > we should create the tty files. I need to fix that.
>
> Cool. Once again... Looks like we got some real progress here with
> this one. I've still got more testing to do, undoing some of my changes
> in the container itself and making sure it all still works.
>
> Also looks like I can stop and restart one of these containers now
> without the hung cgroup directory. I suspected it was some stray
> devices behind that. This is good.
>
> > Of course in your case since systemd isn't going to start getty's on
> > them, you should not have the lxc.tty = 6 in your container config,
> > which it looks like you still do?
>
> Yeah. I was taking it one step at a time. I wish they WOULD fire up
> some getty's on those tty's since that basically makes lxc-console kinda
As I recall, you can specify gettys to start on any tty by creating a
magical symlink, something like
$ETC/getty.target.wants/getty\@tty{1,2,3,4,5,6}.service
> useless and the one on /dev/console is kinda useless in disconnected
> mode with the console redirected to a file. Maybe we need some what for
> lxc-console to be able to grab that? I'll have to look deeper at
> systemd and figure out if it can be parameterized or conditionalized in
> some way. ITMT, I probably will just turn them off.
>
> Many thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Mike
> --
> Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 | mhw at WittsEnd.com
> /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/ | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
> NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
> PGP Key: 0x674627FF | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
More information about the lxc-users
mailing list