[Lxc-users] read only rootfs

Michael H. Warfield mhw at WittsEnd.com
Tue Jul 19 19:19:20 UTC 2011


On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 13:34 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: 
> Quoting C Anthony Risinger (anthony at xtfx.me):
> > there it would seem.  however, while i could *maybe* see the rootfs
> > being an unconditional slave, i would NOT want to see any lxc
> > default/enforcement preventing container -> host propagation on a
> > globally recursive scale.  im of the opinion that the implementor
> > should decide the best tactic ... especially in light of the fact the
> > one distro may not even have the same problems as say
> > ubutnu/fedora/etc because they keep mount points private by default.

> Good point.  (I don't see it on ubuntu either fwiw)  Perhaps there
> should be a toggle in the per-container config file?

Quick question.

Is there any way to test for these flags (SHARED, PRIVATE, SLAVE)?  I
don't see them showing up anywhere from mount, in proc mounts or
mountstats.  How do you check to see if they are set?

Regards,
Mike
-- 
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 |  mhw at WittsEnd.com
   /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/          | (678) 463-0932 |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
   NIC whois: MHW9          | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0x674627FF        | possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 482 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/attachments/20110719/3d89b485/attachment.pgp>


More information about the lxc-users mailing list