[Lxc-users] blkio.weight doesn't work

Zhu Yanhai zhu.yanhai at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 09:01:40 UTC 2011


And neither slice_idle nor group_idle is zero? Did you change any
default parameters for CFQ?

-zyh

在 2011年12月14日 下午4:55,陈竞 <cj.magina at gmail.com> 写道:
> my io scheduler is CFQ.... So the result is weird
>
> 在 2011年12月14日 下午4:12,陈竞 <cj.magina at gmail.com>写道:
>
>> Hi, i'm using lxc in my project, i want to control disk io speed, so i use
>> blkio.weight. I test it, but the result is confusing.
>> I create two container A and B:
>> A: blkio.weight = 100            B : blkio.weight=1000
>>
>> the running process in A and B are the same, which is bash script :
>> dd if=/tmp/xxx of=/dev/null
>> the size of xxx is 400Mb
>>
>> I suppose that A would be slower than B, since its weight is small, while
>> the test turns out that B run as fast as A, they are in same speed.
>> Can any help me figure it out ?
>> PS: my kernel is 2.6.32, and lxc is 0.7.5
>> --
>> 陈竞,中科院计算技术研究所,高性能计算机中心
>> Jing Chen HPCC.ICT.AC China
>
>
>
>
> --
> 陈竞,中科院计算技术研究所,高性能计算机中心
> Jing Chen HPCC.ICT.AC China
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
> This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the benefits?
> Why are businesses embracing it? What are its payoffs and pitfalls?
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sdnl/114/51425149/
> _______________________________________________
> Lxc-users mailing list
> Lxc-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
>




More information about the lxc-users mailing list