[Lxc-users] Proposal for an FHS-compliant default guest filesystem location
Walter Stanish
walter.stanish at saffrondigital.com
Fri Oct 29 23:32:49 UTC 2010
Hi all,
I have been playing with LXC on and off for a few months now. It's
great. Thanks so much to all developers and the wider user community
for making yet another powerful set of functionality available to the
free world! :)
Now that's out of the way...
One higher-level issue I see at present is that the various
distribution packages and lxc userspace/template scripts seem to have
different concepts of the 'correct' destination for container-related
files.
While /etc/lxc may be a good choice for configuration files, guest
root filesystems may be of considerable size and should definitely
stay away from /etc/
Right now this is not the case. For example 'lxc-create -t fedora -n
fedora' will create /etc/lxc/fedora/rootfs
To see what 'the right approach' might be, I had a look at the
Filesystem Heirarchy Standard v2.3 (2004) @
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/
Apparently the decision earlier this year to move the template scripts
out of standard binary locations was made against this standard, so it
would seem a good place to seek guidance.
http://lxc.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lxc/lxc;a=commitdiff_plain;h=c01d62f21b21ba6c2b8b78ab3c2b37cc8f8fd265
Reading the document, it appears that one of the following may be a
better location for guests' root filesystems:
/srv/lxc
/var/lxc
/var/lib/lxc
The reason *not* to use /srv/lxc is the following quote from page 15
of the FHS v2.3 PDF:
"This setup will differ from host to host. Therefore, no program
should rely on a specific subdirectory structure of /srv existing or
data necessarily being stored in /srv"
The data should not be placed in /usr ("/usr is shareable, read-only
data" - page 18).
It thus appears that one of the /var/lxc or /var/lib/lxc options appear best:
"/var is specified here in order to make it possible to mount /usr
read-only. Everything that once went into /usr that is written to
during system operation (as opposed to installation and software
maintenance) must be in /var" (page 30)
Later the FHS states (page 30):
"Applications must generally not add directories to the top level of
/var. Such directories should only be added if they have some
system-wide implication, and in consultation with the FHS mailing
list"
Therefore I humbly propose:
- the establishment of /var/lib/lxc as the default top-level
directory for guest filesystems
(eg: /var/lib/lxc/<guestname>)
- all use of /etc/lxc/<guestname>/rootfs should be considered deprecated
- legacy installations may create /etc/lxc/<guestname>/rootfs
symlinks to assist with migration
Thoughts?
- Walter
More information about the lxc-users
mailing list