[Lxc-users] [lxc-devel] [Fwd: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing control.]

[Daniel Lezcano]

Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote:
>     Please let me know when such patchset / afferent tools are
> available. (I hope that the patchset is also applicable to prior
> kernel verions (.33, .34)...)
>   

Mmh, would it makes sense to have an out-of-tree lxc kernel grouping all 
the patches around related to the containers ?
like sysfs per namespace, udev event, entering a container ...
At least the ones having a very good chance to be merged upstream ?

>     Ciprian.
>
>     P.S.: For those interested I'm playing with LXC to isolate
> different applications, and my intent is that my working machine is
> going to be a combination of Gentoo (or Debian?) (for boot,
> networking, disk, and services), ArchLinux (for desktop applicaions
> like Firefox and OpenOffice), and custom built applications (here LXC
> allows me to separate the roots so that the package managers are not
> going to interfere one with another). I also want that all my services
> (dnscache, polipo proxy, etc.) to be contained in restricted
> containers.
>