[Lxc-users] 0.7.2 - 0.7.3 changes

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 12/06/2010 03:39 PM, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
> Cuma 12 Kasım 2010 günü (saat 12:05:29) Daniel Lezcano şunları yazmıştı:
>    
>> On 11/09/2010 09:33 PM, Brian K. White wrote:
>>      
>    
>> If I understood correctly, you are using the git head which is 0.7.3 + 1
>> patch, right ?
>>
>> After your container is started, what gives the ouput of lxc-ps --lxc ?
>>      
> We're having the same problems too. Here's the configuration file:
>
> lxc.utsname = c2-farm32
> lxc.network.type = veth
> lxc.network.flags = up
> lxc.network.link = br0
> lxc.network.ipv4 = 192.168.3.140/24
> lxc.network.hwaddr = DE:AD:BE:EF:24:94
> lxc.network.name = eth0
> lxc.mount = /etc/lxc/c2-farm32/fstab
> lxc.rootfs = /etc/lxc/c2-farm32/rootfs
> lxc.arch = i686
>
> /etc/lxc/c2-farm32/fstab:
> --------------------------
>
> none /etc/lxc/c2-farm32/rootfs/dev/pts devpts defaults 0 0
> none /etc/lxc/c2-farm32/rootfs/proc    proc   defaults 0 0
> none /etc/lxc/c2-farm32/rootfs/sys     sysfs  defaults 0 0
> none /etc/lxc/c2-farm32/rootfs/dev/shm tmpfs  defaults 0 0
>
>
> With 0.7.2, no problem at all but with the 0.7.3 tarball, no /proc is
> available thus initscripts fail at various places.
>
> Is the behaviour change was intentional or is this a bug?
>    

My bad this change is intentional but I thought it should not impact 
people. I was wrong :s

We had a discussion with Michael Tokarev and we think it is better to 
specify in the mount file the mount point relatively to the rootfs 
instead of a full pathname.