[Lxc-users] unstoppable container
Serge E. Hallyn
serge.hallyn at canonical.com
Tue Aug 31 13:49:23 UTC 2010
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (serge.hallyn at canonical.com):
> > >Without a bug, an SRU ain't gonna fly.
> >
> > Sure I can do this. What should I write in the report exactly and
> > what is the correct email address I write to?
> >
> > - kernel version (2.6.32.x)
> > - system (Ubuntu)
>
> and that it's an uptodate lucid.
>
> > - container was unstoppable(?) even if there were no processess
> > - the way I was successful
> > - ...and?
>
> A recipe to reproduce the bug. It has to be reproducible. Then
> I'll run the recipe and when I see the failure, I'll confirm the
> bug (which a separate second person needs to do).
>
> thanks,
> -serge
But I think Ferenc is right - we should pursue -stable first.
Can you reply to this with a recipe to reproduce? I can take it
from there if you like, or, if you prefer, I'll be elated to have
you try and push the patches to -stable :)
thanks,
-serge
More information about the lxc-users
mailing list