[Lxc-users] unstoppable container

Serge E. Hallyn serge.hallyn at canonical.com
Tue Aug 31 13:36:34 UTC 2010


Quoting Ferenc Wagner (wferi at niif.hu):
> "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn at canonical.com> writes:
> 
> > Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezcano at free.fr):
> >
> >> On 08/31/2010 12:23 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >>
> >>> Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezcano at free.fr):
> >>>
> >>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=13aa9a6b0f2371d2ce0de57c2ede62ab7a787157
> >>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=dd34200adc01c5217ef09b55905b5c2312d65535
> >>
> >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commit;h=614c517d7c00af1b26ded20646b329397d6f51a1
> >>
> >>>> Are they small enough for a SRU ?
> >>>
> >>> The first one looks trivial enough.  I'd be afraid the second one would be
> >>> considered to have deep and subtle regression potential.  But, we can
> >>> always try.  I'm not on the kernel team so am not likely to have any say
> >>> on it myself :)
> >> 
> >> Shall we ask directly to the kernel-team@ mailing list? Or do we
> >> have to do a SRU first ?
> >
> > Actually, first step would be for Papp to open a bug against both
> > lxc and the kernel.  Papp, do you mind doing that?
> >
> > Without a bug, an SRU ain't gonna fly.
> 
> I'm not sure what an SRU is, is that something Ubuntu-specific?  I'd

Yes, specific to Ubuntu LTS (long term support) releases.

> appreciate instead going through stable at kernel.org, so that everybody
> benefits from this backporting effort.

TBH, looking at the commit messages, it might be tough to make the case
for -stable.  They sure make the patches sound fluffy.  And since the
problem can be worked around in userspace, I'm not sure the following
rule:

- It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
  marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, data corruption, a real
  security issue, or some "oh, that's not good" issue.  In short, something
  critical.

from Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt is satisfied.  But if you
all prefer to try that route first I'll certainly not object.

> New 2.6.32.y stable releases are
> automatically incorporated by most distros AFAIK.
> 
> (Btw. Papp is the surname of the reporter, so you may want to refer to
> him as Mr. Papp or as László, which is his first name.)
> -- 
> Regards,
> Feri.

Oops




More information about the lxc-users mailing list