[lxc-devel] [PATCH] mount_proc_if_needed: only safe mount when rootfs is defined
Bogdan Purcareata
bogdan.purcareata at nxp.com
Wed Jan 20 10:53:57 UTC 2016
The safe_mount function was introduced in order to address CVE-2015-1335,
one of the vulnerabilities being a mount with a symlink for the
destination path. In scenarios such as lxc-execute with no rootfs, the
destination path is the host /proc, which is previously mounted by the
host, and is unmounted and mounted again in a new set of namespaces,
therefore eliminating the need to check for it being a symlink.
Mount the rootfs normally if the rootfs is NULL, keep the safe mount
only for scenarios where a different rootfs is defined.
Signed-off-by: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata at nxp.com>
---
src/lxc/conf.c | 1 +
src/lxc/utils.c | 10 +++++++++-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/lxc/conf.c b/src/lxc/conf.c
index 632dde3..1e30c0c 100644
--- a/src/lxc/conf.c
+++ b/src/lxc/conf.c
@@ -3509,6 +3509,7 @@ int ttys_shift_ids(struct lxc_conf *c)
return 0;
}
+/* NOTE: not to be called from inside the container namespace! */
int tmp_proc_mount(struct lxc_conf *lxc_conf)
{
int mounted;
diff --git a/src/lxc/utils.c b/src/lxc/utils.c
index ed8c4c4..e31228d 100644
--- a/src/lxc/utils.c
+++ b/src/lxc/utils.c
@@ -1704,6 +1704,8 @@ int safe_mount(const char *src, const char *dest, const char *fstype,
*
* Returns < 0 on failure, 0 if the correct proc was already mounted
* and 1 if a new proc was mounted.
+ *
+ * NOTE: not to be called from inside the container namespace!
*/
int mount_proc_if_needed(const char *rootfs)
{
@@ -1737,8 +1739,14 @@ int mount_proc_if_needed(const char *rootfs)
return 0;
domount:
- if (safe_mount("proc", path, "proc", 0, NULL, rootfs) < 0)
+ if (!strcmp(rootfs,"")) /* rootfs is NULL */
+ ret = mount("proc", path, "proc", 0, NULL);
+ else
+ ret = safe_mount("proc", path, "proc", 0, NULL, rootfs);
+
+ if (ret < 0)
return -1;
+
INFO("Mounted /proc in container for security transition");
return 1;
}
--
1.9.1
More information about the lxc-devel
mailing list