[lxc-devel] [PATCH] lxc-ls: remove unused argument + small fixes
Serge Hallyn
serge.hallyn at ubuntu.com
Tue Jan 19 21:02:00 UTC 2016
Quoting Christian Brauner (christianvanbrauner at gmail.com):
> - remove unused argument from ls_get()
> - Fix ls_has_all_groups() but leave the inefficient basic algorithm untouched
> for now. (Will be fixed in a dedicated commit.)
> - insert missing ;
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner at mailbox.org>
> ---
> src/lxc/lxc_ls.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_ls.c b/src/lxc/lxc_ls.c
> index bfe37cb..b270ff1 100644
> --- a/src/lxc/lxc_ls.c
> +++ b/src/lxc/lxc_ls.c
> @@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ static void ls_free_arr(char **arr, size_t size);
> * container) cannot be retrieved.
> */
> static int ls_get(struct ls **m, size_t *size, const struct lxc_arguments *args,
> - struct lengths *lht, const char *basepath, const char *parent,
> - unsigned int lvl, char **lockpath, size_t len_lockpath);
> + const char *basepath, const char *parent, unsigned int lvl,
> + char **lockpath, size_t len_lockpath);
> static char *ls_get_cgroup_item(struct lxc_container *c, const char *item);
> static char *ls_get_config_item(struct lxc_container *c, const char *item,
> bool running);
> @@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ static char *ls_get_groups(struct lxc_container *c, bool running);
> static char *ls_get_ips(struct lxc_container *c, const char *inet);
> struct wrapargs {
> const struct lxc_arguments *args;
> - struct lengths *lht;
> int pipefd[2];
> size_t *size;
> const char *parent;
> @@ -233,7 +232,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> /* &(char *){NULL} is no magic. It's just a compound literal which
> * avoids having a pointless variable in main() that serves no purpose
> * here. */
> - int status = ls_get(&ls_arr, &ls_size, &my_args, &max_len, "", NULL, 0, &(char *){NULL}, 0);
> + int status = ls_get(&ls_arr, &ls_size, &my_args, "", NULL, 0, &(char *){NULL}, 0);
> if (!ls_arr && status == 0)
> /* We did not fail. There was just nothing to do. */
> exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
> @@ -307,8 +306,8 @@ static void ls_free_arr(char **arr, size_t size)
> }
>
> static int ls_get(struct ls **m, size_t *size, const struct lxc_arguments *args,
> - struct lengths *lht, const char *basepath, const char *parent,
> - unsigned int lvl, char **lockpath, size_t len_lockpath)
> + const char *basepath, const char *parent, unsigned int lvl,
> + char **lockpath, size_t len_lockpath)
> {
> /* As ls_get() is non-tail recursive we face the inherent danger of
> * blowing up the stack at some level of nesting. To have at least some
> @@ -476,7 +475,6 @@ static int ls_get(struct ls **m, size_t *size, const struct lxc_arguments *args,
> /* Send in the parent for the next nesting level. */
> wargs.parent = l->name;
> wargs.args = args;
> - wargs.lht = lht;
>
> pid_t out;
>
> @@ -528,11 +526,11 @@ static int ls_get(struct ls **m, size_t *size, const struct lxc_arguments *args,
> if (ls_remove_lock(path, name, lockpath, &len_lockpath, true) == -1)
> goto put_and_next;
>
> - ls_get(m, size, args, lht, newpath, l->name, lvl + 1, lockpath, len_lockpath);
> + ls_get(m, size, args, newpath, l->name, lvl + 1, lockpath, len_lockpath);
> free(newpath);
>
> /* Remove the lock. No need to check for failure here. */
> - ls_remove_lock(path, name, lockpath, &len_lockpath, false)
> + ls_remove_lock(path, name, lockpath, &len_lockpath, false);
> }
>
> put_and_next:
> @@ -688,13 +686,16 @@ static bool ls_has_all_grps(const char *has, const char *must)
> if (tmp_must_len > tmp_has_len)
> tmp_must_len = tmp_has_len = 0;
>
> - bool broke_out = false;
> + bool broke_out = false, ran_once = false;
> char **s, **t;
> /* Check if container has all relevant groups. */
> for (s = tmp_must; (tmp_must_len > 0) && (tmp_has_len > 0) && s && *s; s++) {
> if (broke_out)
> broke_out = false;
Can you explain in what cases broke_out could be true here?
broke_out is not 'static' and starts out false, and you break out and return
from the fn any time you set broke_out to true.
(My question pertains to the original code; I should've noticed it last
time)
> + else if (!broke_out && ran_once)
> + break;
> for (t = tmp_has; t && *t; t++) {
> + ran_once = true;
> if (strcmp(*s, *t) == 0) {
> broke_out = true;
> break;
> @@ -946,7 +947,7 @@ static int ls_get_wrapper(void *wrap)
> /* &(char *){NULL} is no magic. It's just a compound literal which
> * avoids having a pointless variable in main() that serves no purpose
> * here. */
> - ls_get(&m, &len, wargs->args, wargs->lht, "", wargs->parent, wargs->nestlvl, &(char *){NULL}, 0);
> + ls_get(&m, &len, wargs->args, "", wargs->parent, wargs->nestlvl, &(char *){NULL}, 0);
> if (!m)
> goto out;
>
> --
> 2.7.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-devel mailing list
> lxc-devel at lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
More information about the lxc-devel
mailing list