[lxc-devel] question about /sys/fs/cgroup/cgmanager

[Dietmar Maurer]

> The reason we did it this way instead of just binding in the sock itself is
> because if cgmanager restarts, this allows all containers to continue and
> just pick up the new socket.  Binding in the socket itself would make
> umount+rm in the container innocuous, but a cgmanager restart would be
> problematic in the container.

Thanks for the details.