[lxc-devel] [PATCH 3/9] lxc_start: ERROR if container is already running.
Tycho Andersen
tycho.andersen at canonical.com
Tue Oct 21 14:58:29 UTC 2014
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 02:54:34PM +0000, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Tycho Andersen (tycho.andersen at canonical.com):
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 02:29:28PM +0000, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > > Quoting Tycho Andersen (tycho.andersen at canonical.com):
> > > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:16:54AM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> > > > > We should exit with a error when starting a running container.
> > > >
> > > > Is this intentional? I just noticed it when pulling from master that
> > > > it breaks some of my scripts. Are we sure it doesn't break anything
> > > > else?
> > >
> > > Which scripts does it break?
> >
> > No public ones, just some that I wrote myself. Just curious if the
> > behavior change was intentional or not (I prefer the previous behavior
> > :)
>
> What exactly is the change? Did it used to return true instead of
> false? The intent was simply to shortcut a bunch of extra work in
> the case where the container was already running.
Yes, sorry. It used to exit 0 instead of 1 when the container was
already running (and didn't print any ERROR or anything).
Tycho
> -serge
More information about the lxc-devel
mailing list