[lxc-devel] RFC: Device Namespaces

Eric W. Biederman ebiederm at xmission.com
Wed Sep 25 20:23:46 UTC 2013


Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen at gmail.com> writes:

> That being said, is there a valid reason why binder is part of device
> namespace here instead of IPC?

I think the practical issue with binder was simply that binder only
allows for a single instance and thus is does not play nicely with
containers.

Eric





More information about the lxc-devel mailing list