[lxc-devel] [lxc/lxc] 07520b: Update maintainers and URLs

[Stéphane Graber]

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:14:21PM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgraber at ubuntu.com):
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 12:28:05PM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
> > > On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 21:49:03 -0700
> > > GitHub <noreply at github.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > >   Branch: refs/heads/master
> > > >   Home:   https://github.com/lxc/lxc
> > > >   Commit: 07520b2af5495cbde94645d09b523de73047542d
> > > 
> > > Would it be an idea to have a separate mailing list for git commits? I
> > > think the mailing list is painfully noisy.
> > > 
> > > -nc
> > 
> > Not really. I need both patches and commits on the same mailing-list as
> > I believe both Serge and my workflows involve keeping the threads
> > locally until the commit to the branch at which point we flush the whole
> > thread locally.
> > 
> > Having to look at two mailing-lists would make that quite a bit harder
> > and I'm sure we're not the only ones who like to see the actual git
> > commit after some patch received enough acks (as we don't always commit
> > them to git immediately).
> 
> Actually my complaint would be different - if I push two or more commits,
> only the last one gets an email.  I think it would be good - informative
> for everyone - if *every* commit got an email.  I really didn't think
> they've been noisy enough to even mention procmail.
> 
> -serge

All commits are actually mentioned, but github merge them into a single
e-mail per push which is indeed slightly annoying, sadly, there's no
configuration that I could find to force one e-mail per commit...

-- 
Stéphane Graber
Ubuntu developer
http://www.ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-devel/attachments/20131021/1f28e880/attachment.pgp>