[lxc-devel] Possible bug in lxc-netstat w/ patch; feature patch
Serge Hallyn
serge.hallyn at ubuntu.com
Wed Jun 26 13:57:10 UTC 2013
Quoting Andrew Gilbert (andrewg800 at gmail.com):
> Hi,
> I think I've discovered a bug in lxc-netstat when trying to have it run
> netstat with the '-n' option. I've attached a patch for this below
> (patch 1). I've also attached a patch that tries to Do The Right Thing
> if someone uses '-n' without the '--' before it (patch 2). I'd be happy
> to resend the patches as separate emails if that would be better.
> --Andrew G
Hi,
thanks, first patch confirmed and
Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn at ubuntu.com>
from me. But yes, please do resend as separate patches (threaded,
1/2 and 2/2) and (more importantly) do include a signed-off-by.
(If there were more than 2 emails I'd suggest using git-send-email,
but with two that's a bit over the top)
(Question below on second patch)
>
> S T E P S T O R E P R O D U C E:
> 1. Start a container.
> 2. Use lxc-netstat -n <container-name> -- -n -a to try to get numeric
> IPs in netstat output.
> 3. Get error "./lxc-netstat: 75: shift: can't shift that many."
>
> It appears that after the execution of lxc-unshare, the call to
> lxc-netstat does not include the '--' separator to prevent the netstat
> arguments being interpreted as lxc-netstat arguments. This only would
> manifest as a bug if the option is one that is valid for lxc-netstat as
> well as netstat, as the lone -n option is.
>
> P A T C H 1:
> From 78ea721f2a6b0cc01cffba93109bd8d8202eeb98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andrew Gilbert <andrewg800 at gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:24:37 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] Add double-dash to lxc-netstat re-call arguments
>
> When lxc-netstat was called by lxc-unshare, it would be given the
> arguments intended for netstat from the first invocation, but without
> anything to separate them from the arguments intended for lxc-netstat.
> This meant that netstat arguments like -n would result in lxc-netstat
> trying to process them
> ---
> src/lxc/lxc-netstat.in | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc-netstat.in b/src/lxc/lxc-netstat.in
> index 2fa2d23..229c214 100644
> --- a/src/lxc/lxc-netstat.in
> +++ b/src/lxc/lxc-netstat.in
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ if [ -z "$name" ]; then
> fi
>
> if [ -z "$exec" ]; then
> - exec @BINDIR@/lxc-unshare -s MOUNT -- $0 -n $name --exec "$@"
> + exec @BINDIR@/lxc-unshare -s MOUNT -- $0 -n $name --exec -- "$@"
> fi
>
> if lxc-info -n $name --state-is 'STOPPED'; then
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
> P A T C H 2:
> From e45138027e08d291f4fad1357bcf5cb1b610c402 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andrew Gilbert <andrewg800 at gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:36:28 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Add -n differentiation to lxc-netstat
>
> lxc-netstat now only processes an -n argument if it has not previously
> received a value for $name from --name or -n. If it _has_ received such
> a value, it stops processing arguments and leaves the -n for netstat.
> This does not apply to the use of --name after a name has been provided
> by --name or -n; the current behaviour continues.
Can you please give a test case here? It sounds to me like you're
supporting
lxc-netstat -n <container-name> -n -a
without the '--'. I'm not sure we want to do that - the rules end
up more ambiguous than a simple 'use -- to pass arguments on'.
> ---
> src/lxc/lxc-netstat.in | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc-netstat.in b/src/lxc/lxc-netstat.in
> index 229c214..4a239d9 100644
> --- a/src/lxc/lxc-netstat.in
> +++ b/src/lxc/lxc-netstat.in
> @@ -66,12 +66,23 @@ get_parent_cgroup()
> }
>
> exec=""
> +name=""
>
> while true; do
> case $1 in
> -h|--help)
> help; exit 1;;
> - -n|--name)
> + -n)
> + # If we already have a value for $name, treat -n as being an
> + # argument for netstat
> + if [ -n "$name" ]
> + then
> + break
> + else
> + name="$2"; shift 2;
> + fi
> + ;;
> + --name)
> name=$2; shift 2;;
> --exec)
> exec="exec"; shift;;
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Lxc-devel mailing list
> Lxc-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
More information about the lxc-devel
mailing list