[lxc-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Support stopping containers concurrently
Stéphane Graber
stgraber at ubuntu.com
Tue Apr 23 20:52:49 UTC 2013
On 04/23/2013 05:29 AM, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> Hey Stéphane,
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn at ubuntu.com
> <mailto:serge.hallyn at ubuntu.com>> wrote:
>
> Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (caglar at 10ur.org <mailto:caglar at 10ur.org>):
> > From: "S.Çağlar Onur" <caglar at 10ur.org <mailto:caglar at 10ur.org>>
> >
> > Trying to stop multiple containers concurrently ends up with
> "cgroup is not mounted" errors as multiple threads corrupts the
> shared variables.
> > Fix that stack corruption and start to use getmntent_r to support
> stopping multiple containers concurrently.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: S.Çağlar Onur <caglar at 10ur.org
> <mailto:caglar at 10ur.org>>
> > ---
> > src/lxc/cgroup.c | 152
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > src/lxc/freezer.c | 18 +++++--
> > src/lxc/state.c | 15 ++++--
> > 3 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/lxc/cgroup.c b/src/lxc/cgroup.c
> > index 368214f..0739477 100644
> > --- a/src/lxc/cgroup.c
> > +++ b/src/lxc/cgroup.c
> > @@ -54,6 +54,11 @@ lxc_log_define(lxc_cgroup, lxc);
> >
> > #define MTAB "/proc/mounts"
> >
> > +/* In the case of a bind mount, there could be two long pathnames
> in the
> > + * mntent plus options so use large enough buffer size
> > + */
> > +#define LARGE_MAXPATHLEN 4 * MAXPATHLEN
> > +
> > /* Check if a mount is a cgroup hierarchy for any subsystem.
> > * Return the first subsystem found (or NULL if none).
> > */
> > @@ -100,29 +105,31 @@ static char *mount_has_subsystem(const
> struct mntent *mntent)
> > */
> > static int get_cgroup_mount(const char *subsystem, char *mnt)
> > {
> > - struct mntent *mntent;
> > + struct mntent *mntent, mntent_r;
> > FILE *file = NULL;
> > int ret, err = -1;
> >
> > + char buf[LARGE_MAXPATHLEN] = {0};
>
> Ah yes, this must be what I thought we were waiting on - a response
> from Stéphane on this.
>
> I'm still worried about this stack usage, especially in something
> which is rather commonly called. Stéphane, is this a non-issue
> for arm?
So I had a quick look on an Android device. The stack size is the same
as a desktop machine (8192KB), so the 16KB used by that variable won't
be a problem.
>
>
> Have you had a chance to look at that? Should I keep them like this or
> start to allocate them via calloc?
>
>
> -serge
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> --
> S.Çağlar Onur <caglar at 10ur.org <mailto:caglar at 10ur.org>>
--
Stéphane Graber
Ubuntu developer
http://www.ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 901 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-devel/attachments/20130423/e4bcdb29/attachment.pgp>
More information about the lxc-devel
mailing list