[lxc-devel] [PATCH] API shouldn't be calling create for already defined containers or destroy for non defined ones.

S.Çağlar Onur caglar at 10ur.org
Mon Apr 1 04:13:11 UTC 2013


Yeah I realized that, I'll send the github url in a moment


On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn at ubuntu.com>wrote:

> Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (caglar at 10ur.org):
> > Seems like I sent the wrong path, this one works for me.
>
> note your emails are coming through as html and malformed txt, which
> will be harder to apply.  Would you mind posting a github url?
>
> The lxc-destroy modifications make me a bit uneasy, but they should be
> ok.
>
> Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn at ubuntu.com>
>
> > diff --git a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> > index 480c4f5..9ed3443 100644
> > --- a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> > +++ b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> > @@ -523,14 +523,15 @@ static bool lxcapi_create(struct lxc_container *c,
> > char *t, char *const argv[])
> >   goto out;
> >   }
> >
> > - if (!create_container_dir(c))
> > - goto out;
> > -
> >   if (!c->save_config(c, NULL)) {
> >   ERROR("failed to save starting configuration for %s\n", c->name);
> >   goto out;
> >   }
> >
> > + /* container is already created if we have a config and rootfs.path is
> > accessible */
> > + if (c->lxc_conf && c->lxc_conf->rootfs.path &&
> > access(c->lxc_conf->rootfs.path, F_OK) == 0)
> > + return false;
> > +
> >   /* we're going to fork.  but since we'll wait for our child, we
> >     don't need to lxc_container_get */
> >
> > @@ -767,6 +768,9 @@ static bool lxcapi_save_config(struct lxc_container
> *c,
> > const char *alt_file)
> >   return false;
> >   }
> >
> > + if (!create_container_dir(c))
> > + return false;
> > +
> >   FILE *fout = fopen(alt_file, "w");
> >   if (!fout)
> >   return false;
> > @@ -788,6 +792,10 @@ static bool lxcapi_destroy(struct lxc_container *c)
> >   if (!c)
> >   return false;
> >
> > + /* container is already destroyed if we don't have a config or
> > rootfs.path is not accessible */
> > + if (!c->lxc_conf || !c->lxc_conf->rootfs.path ||
> > access(c->lxc_conf->rootfs.path, F_OK) != 0)
> > + return false;
> > +
> >   pid = fork();
> >   if (pid < 0)
> >   return false;
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 7:56 PM, S.Çağlar Onur <caglar at 10ur.org> wrote:
> >
> > > What about something like following?
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> > > index 480c4f5..eb99e5a 100644
> > > --- a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> > > +++ b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> > > @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static bool lxcapi_create(struct lxc_container *c,
> > > char *t, char *const argv[])
> > >   int len, nargs = 0;
> > >   char **newargv;
> > >
> > > - if (!c)
> > > + if (!c || access(c->lxc_conf->rootfs.path, F_OK) == 0)
> > >    return false;
> > >
> > >   len = strlen(LXCTEMPLATEDIR) + strlen(t) + strlen("/lxc-") + 1;
> > > @@ -523,9 +523,6 @@ static bool lxcapi_create(struct lxc_container *c,
> > > char *t, char *const argv[])
> > >   goto out;
> > >   }
> > >
> > > - if (!create_container_dir(c))
> > > - goto out;
> > > -
> > >   if (!c->save_config(c, NULL)) {
> > >   ERROR("failed to save starting configuration for %s\n", c->name);
> > >   goto out;
> > > @@ -767,6 +764,9 @@ static bool lxcapi_save_config(struct lxc_container
> > > *c, const char *alt_file)
> > >   return false;
> > >   }
> > >
> > > + if (!create_container_dir(c))
> > > + return false;
> > > +
> > >   FILE *fout = fopen(alt_file, "w");
> > >   if (!fout)
> > >   return false;
> > > @@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ static bool lxcapi_destroy(struct lxc_container *c)
> > >   pid_t pid;
> > >   int ret, status;
> > >
> > > - if (!c)
> > > + if (!c || access(c->lxc_conf->rootfs.path, F_OK) != 0)
> > >    return false;
> > >
> > >   pid = fork();
> > >
> > >
> > > and this is how it behaves with it;
> > >
> > > caglar at qgq:~$ cat test.py
> > > import lxc
> > > c = lxc.Container("abcdef")
> > > print (c.set_config_item("lxc.utsname", "abcdef"))
> > >  print (c.save_config())
> > > print (c.create("ubuntu"))
> > > print (c.create("ubuntu"))
> > > print (c.destroy())
> > > print (c.destroy())
> > >
> > > caglar at qgq:~$ sudo python3 test.py
> > > True
> > > True
> > > True
> > > False
> > > True
> > > False
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 7:26 PM, S.Çağlar Onur <caglar at 10ur.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Stéphane,
> > >>
> > >> Hmm, then I believe there is another bug somewhere cause here is what
> > >> happens with your ordering;
> > >>
> > >> caglar at qgq:~/Project/lxc$ sudo python3
> > >> Python 3.2.3 (default, Oct 19 2012, 19:53:16)
> > >> [GCC 4.7.2] on linux2
> > >> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
> > >> >>> import lxc
> > >> __main__:1: Warning: The python-lxc API isn't yet stable and may
> change
> > >> at any point in the future.
> > >>  >>> c = lxc.Container("abcdef")
> > >> >>> c.set_config_item("lxc.utsname", "blah")
> > >> True
> > >> >>> c.set_config_item("lxc.utsname", "abcdef")
> > >> True
> > >> >>> c.save_config()
> > >> False
> > >> >>> c.config_file_name
> > >> '/var/lib/lxc/abcdef/config'
> > >>
> > >> so it looks like save_config don't work if the container directory is
> not
> > >> there and as long as I see only create calls create_container_dir to
> do
> > >> that.
> > >>
> > >> Maybe correct way to handle that is to call create_container_dir from
> > >> save_config as well but checking the rootfs directory's existence from
> > >> create/destrory?
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Stéphane Graber <stgraber at ubuntu.com
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > On 03/31/2013 04:22 PM, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> > >> > > From: "S.Çağlar Onur" <caglar at 10ur.org>
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Currently it behaves like following which might be confusing for
> the
> > >> code that checks the return value of those calls to determine whether
> > >> operation completed successfully or not.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >>> c = lxc.Container("r")
> > >> > >>>> c.create("ubuntu")
> > >> > > True
> > >> > >>>> c.create("ubuntu")
> > >> > > True
> > >> > >>>> c.create("ubuntu")
> > >> > > True
> > >> > >>>> c.create("ubuntu")
> > >> > > True
> > >> > >>>> c.create("ubuntu")
> > >> > >>>> c.destroy()
> > >> > > True
> > >> > >>>> c.destroy()
> > >> > > lxc-destroy: 'r' does not exist
> > >> > > False
> > >> > >>>> c.destroy()
> > >> > > lxc-destroy: 'r' does not exist
> > >> > > False
> > >> > >
> > >> > > New behaviour
> > >> > >
> > >> > >>>> c = lxc.Container("r")
> > >> > >>>> c.create('ubuntu')
> > >> > > True
> > >> > >>>> c.create('ubuntu')
> > >> > > False
> > >> > >>>> c.destroy()
> > >> > > True
> > >> > >>>> c.destroy()
> > >> > > False
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Won't this break the following?
> > >> > c = lxc.Container("abcdef")
> > >> > c.set_config_item("lxc.utsname", "blah")
> > >> > c.save_config()
> > >> > c.create("ubuntu")
> > >> >
> > >> > I personally always considered ".create()" to mean "generate a new
> > >> > rootfs" which doesn't at all mean "generate a new config file".
> > >> >
> > >> > ".destroy()" on the other hand destroys everything, including the
> > >> config.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > > Signed-off-by: S.Çağlar Onur <caglar at 10ur.org>
> > >> > > ---
> > >> > >  src/lxc/lxccontainer.c |    4 ++--
> > >> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > diff --git a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> > >> > > index 480c4f5..7a11c85 100644
> > >> > > --- a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> > >> > > +++ b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> > >> > > @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static bool lxcapi_create(struct lxc_container
> > >> *c, char *t, char *const argv[])
> > >> > >       int len, nargs = 0;
> > >> > >       char **newargv;
> > >> > >
> > >> > > -     if (!c)
> > >> > > +     if (!c || lxcapi_is_defined(c))
> > >> > >               return false;
> > >> > >
> > >> > >       len = strlen(LXCTEMPLATEDIR) + strlen(t) + strlen("/lxc-")
> + 1;
> > >> > > @@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ static bool lxcapi_destroy(struct
> lxc_container
> > >> *c)
> > >> > >       pid_t pid;
> > >> > >       int ret, status;
> > >> > >
> > >> > > -     if (!c)
> > >> > > +     if (!c || !lxcapi_is_defined(c))
> > >> > >               return false;
> > >> > >
> > >> > >       pid = fork();
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Stéphane Graber
> > >> > Ubuntu developer
> > >> > http://www.ubuntu.com
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
> > >> > Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete
> > >> > for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam.
> > >> > $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo
> > >> > by 6/6/13. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/12124-176961-30367-2
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > Lxc-devel mailing list
> > >> > Lxc-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> S.Çağlar Onur <caglar at 10ur.org>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > S.Çağlar Onur <caglar at 10ur.org>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > S.Çağlar Onur <caglar at 10ur.org>
>
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
> > Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest.
> > Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game
> > on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes.
> > Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lxc-devel mailing list
> > Lxc-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
>
>


-- 
S.Çağlar Onur <caglar at 10ur.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-devel/attachments/20130401/0798aceb/attachment.html>


More information about the lxc-devel mailing list